# How would exhaust heat recovery into the combustion chamber affect the efficiency of a jet engine?

Aviation Asked on January 4, 2022

So, a jet engine basically sucks in air, heats it up and spits it out, right?
The hotter the air gets, the faster the exhaust velocity and thus the more efficient (Higher specific impulse).

Now my question is how this all gets affected if you use a heat recovery system, either a heat pump or a simple heat exchanger. Let’s ignore the annoying practicalities of metals melting and all that stuff and just look at the theoretical side.

If you recover heat from the exhaust and put it back into the combustion chamber how does this affect the efficiency of the engine? If we were to apply the heat into the combustion chamber using a heat pump, pumping heat from the exhaust into the chamber could we get even higher efficiencies? While “Yes/No” answers would suffice I would be much more interested in a thermodynamic explanation and possibly even some estimations of the theoretical efficiency which could be reached using the Carnot cycle for pumping the heat.

Onto the practical, has anything like this been experimented with? To my knowledge we don’t have heat pumps capable of operating at 2000 degrees Celsius and pumping heat quickly enough to compare to any type of engine, but maybe someone has experimented with simple heat exchangers like how rocket engines use regenerative cooling (for different purposes though, but still similar to this).

Extracting heat from the exhaust will cool and compress it, slowing it down and reducing thrust. Recirculating the heat back into or downstream of combustion will raise the temperature at that point and on downstream to the extraction point. The inevitable thermodynamic losses mean that the returned heat does not quite compensate for the heat drawn out and overall efficiency will fall a little.

What does improve efficiency is to draw through additional air mass in order to increase the exhaust mass flow, even at the expense of lower overall velocity and temperature. This is what the bypass turbofan does.

A more radical modification is to swap the combustion chamber for a heat exchanger and heat the gas via hot fluid from an external source; the hotter the fluid the better. I have seen this proposed for the hydrogen turbopump in some versions at least of the SABRE air-breathing rocket engine. It was also proposed for nuclear-powered bombers in the 1950s, though I cannot recall if those included turbojets as well as ramjets.

Answered by Guy Inchbald on January 4, 2022

Theoretically, in an infinitely efficient system, there would be no net difference. The energy lost in the exhaust would be added back to the combustion chamber to be lost again in the exhaust. Maybe, you could use this heat exchange side engine to run another system without losing engine power. But, there is never something for nothing. Although I've read that the cowled radiator for the piston engine spitfire did produce a small amount of thrust as a biproduct.

This is all predicated by the fact that the heat energy is dumped back into the whole system in or after the combustion chamber. If it's before the the compressors, it would lower the density of the air coming in. Your thrust is based on the mass of the air being accelerated. If it dumped into the compressors, that energy may be lost to the peak amount that the compressors can increase density and pressure. It would be lost in the current way compressors shed excess heat. If the compressors could be made of material that did not need to be protected from excess heat, then there would be no need for the heat exchanger adding heat. It would already be there as a biproduct of compression. Therefore, you would not need to rob it from the exhaust.

Answered by Dean F. on January 4, 2022

A couple of remarks:

1. The reaction jet engine produces thrust in the exhaust nozzle. In a subsonic engine the exhaust gas first accelerates in the convergent section of the nozzle then it expands in the divergent section. Expanding, the gas looses not only kinetic energy but it cools down as well. Since the thrust is developed in the last section of the nozzle then having a heat exchanger further down would actually reduce the thrust by reducing the ability of the gas to expand.
2. There is a reactive jet engine that uses heat exchanger. Is called Sabre and the developer tried to solve the problem of suborbital flight using one engine only. At takeoff the engine functions as a reaction jet. Once the speed exceeds the range of usability of the axial compressor, then a heat exchanger placed in the air intake cools down the air to maintain the efficiency of the axial compressor even at supersonic speeds. The airflow through the engine remains subsonic. However, on exhaust the afterburner provides the extra thrust required to maintain speeds in the vicinity of Mach5 to 7. This engine burns hydrogen and uses liquid helium as coolant, or so the developer says. This is a bold undertaking from a private developer.
3. To answer your question: The Sabre is an example of using a heat exchanger in the air intake. The only cooling in the exhaust is meant to keep the hot side operational and not to extract energy from exhaust gas because that will affect the thrust.

Answered by WindSoul on January 4, 2022

## Related Questions

### Based on this fuel flow chart, why isn’t it more optimum to remain at an intermediate altitude rather than climbing?

1  Asked on November 30, 2021 by joe-wie

### Is this how ailerons are actuated?

1  Asked on November 27, 2021

### What is the difference between a glider and a sailplane?

6  Asked on November 25, 2021 by gypsycosmonaut

### How is Altitude/QNH defined state when passing transition altitude?

2  Asked on November 25, 2021 by ondrej-telka

### Why are the cockpit controls of airplanes so complicated?

14  Asked on November 22, 2021

### What are the performance trade-offs in the Icon A5 spin resistant airframe?

1  Asked on November 22, 2021 by pjnoes

### What does pre/post modification mean in Airbus MPD?

1  Asked on November 22, 2021

### In aircraft where the thrust reversers are not locked out when airborne, is it permissible to go around after reverser deployment?

1  Asked on November 20, 2021 by vikki

### How attitude, speed, and altitude vary when increasing pitch?

2  Asked on November 19, 2021

### Why can’t lifting line model be applied to yawed/skewed/oblique straight wing (low M)

1  Asked on November 15, 2021 by si-far

### What is the definition of “blade scatter” in gas turbine compressor dynamic balancing?

1  Asked on November 10, 2021 by arjay-pasague

### How do I find out the fuel consumption of the PT6A for a lightly loaded aircraft?

1  Asked on November 10, 2021 by user46196

### What is the temperature range of engine mounts connected to the pylon?

1  Asked on November 10, 2021

### What are the disadvantages of fitting underwing flaps to a Mirage III/5 fighter jets to lower landing speeds?

3  Asked on November 7, 2021

### Am I required to report an incident that isn’t specifically mentioned in 49 CFR 830?

2  Asked on November 7, 2021

### why does the flow need to decelerate (by a thermal throat) in a scramjet?

1  Asked on November 7, 2021

### How can I avoid flight simulator software reinforcing bad habits?

7  Asked on November 5, 2021

### Plane that always flies into the wind?

7  Asked on September 26, 2021 by jw1

### What is the best procedure for landing at my destination if I have a full electrical failure at night?

4  Asked on September 26, 2021 by aviationlearner