Bioinformatics Asked on May 7, 2021
I’m working with a set of homologous genes (let’s call it gene A) from several bacterial species.
I know (from previously published research) that in gene B (a close paralogue of gene A), there is a non-coding, antisense RNA. This antisense RNA regulates gene B by forming a duplex with the gene B mRNA.
I have noticed that, sometimes, an antisense RNA would be predicted for gene A in the same location in the IMG/MER database. This is not predicted for all of the available gene A sequences, only some of them. IMG/MER uses INFERNAL to predict RNAs, I think.
My question is – is there any way to assess how real this is without wet lab data? As it is, it could be that there’s no actual antisense RNA in gene A, and this is a spurious prediction due to homology. Or it could be that the antisense RNA is present in all of the gene A sequences, and the RNA prediction software simply missed some of them. Is there a computational way of testing which of these options (if any) is more likely? Thank you for your time!
Is there any conserved secondary structure in this RNA? One could align all known instances of this RNA and see if there is any significant covariation according to R-scape. That could serve as a computational signal that the RNA is real (although wet lab experiments would still be needed).
Another question is whether this RNA is already in Rfam? If so, then the job of making an alignment of known instances is easier.
Correct answer by apetrov on May 7, 2021
0 Asked on April 21, 2021 by andrew-scarborough
2 Asked on April 18, 2021
0 Asked on April 18, 2021 by mwp
2 Asked on April 15, 2021 by emma-athan
0 Asked on April 15, 2021 by ahmedbar
0 Asked on April 15, 2021
1 Asked on April 14, 2021 by heather-harrington
1 Asked on April 13, 2021
2 Asked on April 13, 2021 by fp1234
4 Asked on April 11, 2021 by mzzx
0 Asked on April 10, 2021
1 Asked on April 9, 2021 by pippo1980
1 Asked on April 9, 2021 by samir-bouftass
Get help from others!