AnswerBun.com

Time interval correction for step detection algorithm

Computer Science Asked by Johhny Bravo on October 19, 2020

I am currently going over this paper, and in fact have already tried to implement it:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4634483/ [1]

Paper looks at the amplitude of the step and the time between the swings. ALthough I seem to understand the general idea, I am slightly confused about one of the formulas, which describes time between steps, namely:

"To extract only one valley from a gathered group of valley candidates in a very short time range, every valley candidate is validated by checking the time distance to the recent valley using the following threshold.

$Th_v = mu_v – (sigma_v/beta)$

where $mu_v$ and $sigma_v$ represent the average and the standard deviation of the time interval between adjacent valleys in the magnitude of acceleration, respectively. These averages and the standard deviations are calculated for recent M peaks or valleys."*

Except time threshold obviously magnitude is also taken into consideration.

So I have produced magnitudes that I obtain from my sensor:
enter image description here

where red dots correspond to initially discovered valleys and purple to points that should re-evaluate last valley.

So what I currently have is something like this:

1) I obtain valley at point 20. I obtain valley at Point 49. This should mean that the average distance between two valleys is 29 readings, and therefore I set my $mu_v = 29 and sigma = 0$, which yields me a value of $Th_v=29$ ( my $beta = 1/3$). I also store the difference (29).

2) Then I get to point 51, which should update the $Th_v$ value. So now I calculate the mean, which I think means $(29 + (51-49))/2 = 15.5$

And calculate standard deviation, which equals $19.09$. So then when I actually plug these values in the formula above I get $Th_v = -41.909$, which should not be possible as I believe this value should be always positive to indicate the time between two valleys.

Am I dong something incorrect or do you have any idea what’s wrong with my or paper’s approach?

References:

[1]: Lee H, Choi S, Lee M. Step Detection Robust against the Dynamics of Smartphones. Wang X, ed. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2015;15(10):27230-27250. doi:10.3390/s151027230.

One Answer

I managed to solve the problem of the algorithm by using a different approach. Algorithm is not clear on what is happening with the initial values or how to reliably capture a set of peak/valley candidates and how to deal with them.

Therefore, we decided to use only magnitude part of the paper, which radically simplifies the whole algorithm, and in fact works great ( assuming you are getting reasonable sensor readings).

Answered by Johhny Bravo on October 19, 2020

Add your own answers!

Related Questions

Design of a synchronized clock

0  Asked on October 21, 2021 by ahmedou

   

How private IP address is determined?

1  Asked on October 21, 2021 by nurin-izzati-jafri

   

Race Condition in Mesa Monitor

0  Asked on October 21, 2021 by heroman

         

Counting one’s in a stream of bits

0  Asked on October 21, 2021 by srajan

   

Find original array from array with pairs of adjacent elements

1  Asked on October 21, 2021 by james-flanagin

 

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2022 AnswerBun.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, MenuIva, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP, SolveDir