# Implications of secundative alignment

Constructed Languages Asked on August 20, 2021

There are two different ways to handle ditransitive verbs like “give.” For the purposes of this post, in the sentence “John gave Bill the ball,” John is the donor (D), Bill is the recipient (R), and the ball is the theme (T).

# Indirective

With indirective alignment, the theme is marked the same as the patient of a monotransitive verb and the recipient is marked differently (often with a dative case).

John-a   read the book-i  .

John-a   gave the book-i   Bill-e.
John-NOM gave the book-ACC Bill-DAT.
"John gave the book to Bill."


# Secundative

With secundative (or daechtycatiative) alignment, the recipient is marked the same as the patient of a monotransitive verb and the theme is marked differently (often with an instrumental case).

John-a   read the book-i  .

John-a   gave Bill-i   the book-e.
John-NOM gave Bill-ACC the book-INST.
"John gave Bill with the book."


What other grammatical features are likely to be affected by secundative alignment? What considerations do I need to make?

So, here are some of the implications of choosing secundative alignment. They aren't really strict implications so much as Stuff You Might Consider Thinking About™. I think the effects of choosing secundative alignment are pretty local overall and won't have cascading effects on your grammar. In my opinion, the thorniest issue here is dealing with valence-changing operations on verbs.

• What do secundative languages tend to look like in the real world?
• How does secundative alignment manifest itself in morphology or syntax?
• Valence-changing operations
• Relative Clauses

### Real World Secundative Languages.

If you want your language to be naturalistic, I suggest taking a look at WALS to see what kinds of combinations of features are typologically uncommon. If you are not trying to make a naturalistic language, knowing what natural languages tend to do is a good way to spend your "weirdness budget" wisely.

This map marks the strategy used for the verb to give. This analysis could be misleading because it's possible for the verb give to use a different strategy from other verbs, but I think this feature is the best fit for what you're after of the available WALS features.

Looking at the map, my assessment of the broad areal trends is that Eurasia is dominated by the indirect object construction. The secondary object construction seems to be common in North America and in New Guinea.

The WALS Chapter for this feature provides some examples of the different types of constructions as well as a note about what other features commonly co-occur with secondary object marking, excerpt below:

...head-marking languages with verb indexing of two core arguments tend to show the secondary-object pattern...

### How does secundative alignment manifest itself?

Basically, there are four ways your language can manifest secundative alignment.

• word order
• case markers
• verbal agreement

I think most of the real world secundative languages are secundative because the recipient in the verb to give or other similar verbs gets indexed in the verb the same way that a prototypical direct object would.

This can occur in a language with no case marking. So, I give you the book might be something like

book.sg  give.1sg-subj.2sg-obj


In this example, book bears no case marking but is clearly the theme.

The case marking strategy is covered in your example.

For word order, we can take an example from English.

I give you the book


you is the recipient, but occupies the position directly after the verb. In English you have a choice between using a preposition like to or for instead. If no such option existed, this would be a pristine example of syntactic secundativeness.

Note that the language can be partially secundative.

For instance, the following is possible.

you.sg.DAT book.sg.ACC give.1sg-subj.2sg-obj


In this example, the two non-agent arguments book and give receive indirect-object-style case marking, but the verb shows secundative alignment.

### Valence changing operations

It is important to think about how the passive voice, if it exists, should behave.

Suppose we have a language with secundative alignment in its cases.

I.NOM you.OBJ book.INST give.PST
I gave you a book.


If you were to passivize the verb, which argument would be promoted to the agent? Would (101), (102), or neither be acceptable?

(101) you.NOM  give.PSV.PST
(102) book.NOM give.PSV.PST


Do you have an anti-applicative voice that deletes the recipient and promotes the theme to primary object? As far as I know, anti-applicative voices do not exist in the real world, but applicative voice does exist. It's possible to allow this promotion without an explicit voice for it.

I.NOM book.OBJ give.ANTIAPP.PST


This situation gets murkier if the language is both ergative and secundative.

I.ERG you.ABS book.INST give.PST
I gave the book.


In this case, the antipassive voice would delete the absolutive argument and promote the ergative argument.

I.ABS book.INST give.ANTIPSV.PST
I gave the book (to someone).


Some ergative languages mark instruments and agents the same way.

I.ERG book.ERG you.ABS give.PST


In this case, the antipassive voice could potentially target either argument.

I.ABS give.ANTIPSV.PST


or

book.ABS give.ANTIPSV.PST


### Relative clauses

Deciding how relative clauses in secundative languages should work might present some subtle issues.

Languages frequently have a limit on what kinds of arguments can be targeted by relative clauses.

You may want to choose to make only the agent and the primary object extractable, but not secondary objects.

Correct answer by Gregory Nisbet on August 20, 2021

## Related Questions

### Is there a specific term for a constructed writing system purportedly used for a conlang but actually for a natlang?

2  Asked on August 21, 2021

### Is any of the Wakandan writing in Black Panther used for something other than English?

1  Asked on August 21, 2021

### Could you have a language with only three words?

6  Asked on August 20, 2021 by rory-m-tims

### Implications of secundative alignment

1  Asked on August 20, 2021

### Has AI technology yet provide a language composed of multiple human languages yet?

4  Asked on August 20, 2021

### Is it reasonable for numerals to behave like verbs?

1  Asked on August 20, 2021

### Is there a structured toki pona dictionary/thesaurus?

3  Asked on August 20, 2021 by oliver-mason

### Should I include morphology in my proto language?

2  Asked on August 20, 2021 by tateran

### What is reduplication used for in natural languages?

1  Asked on August 20, 2021

### Usage of different plural systems in the same language

3  Asked on August 20, 2021 by keith-morrison

### Is there an open-source set of topics and vocabulary for making a language tutorial?

4  Asked on August 20, 2021 by jetpack

### How to make names in a conlang?

1  Asked on August 20, 2021

### How long do I need to influence language development?

2  Asked on August 20, 2021

### How to say, ‘Haters gonna Hate’ in Toki Pona

2  Asked on August 20, 2021

### How can I name my days of the week?

3  Asked on August 20, 2021

### How can I talk about weather without expletives?

4  Asked on August 20, 2021

### How much ambiguity for argument roles is possible without sacrificing comprehensibility?

0  Asked on August 20, 2021

### What to do when my conlang has a word that means something in one of my languages?

1  Asked on August 20, 2021

### Words for Mercy in Toki Pona?

2  Asked on August 20, 2021 by pureferret

### What things can la mark in Toki Pona?

1  Asked on August 20, 2021