TransWikia.com

What analysis do I do? (Wage, education, gender)

Cross Validated Asked by marvdste on November 6, 2021

I’m doing research on pay in function of degree (master vs. doctorate) and gender (man vs. woman).

My research consists of 1 dependent variable: salary (salary varies from 210 euro to 12.000 euro in absolute numbers) and 1 independent variable degree (master vs. doctorate) and 1 moderator gender (man vs. woman).

I would also like to add some control variables to this analysis such as:

  • age
  • sector
  • contract-type
  • etc.

These control variables are all nominal.

my hypotheses are as follows

  • people with a PhD earn more than people with a master’s degree –> so the higher your degree, the higher the pay
  • men earn more than women
  • men with PhDs earn more than women with PhDs

What statistical analysis can I perform on them? I need to use SPSS.

2 Answers

To give you a clear answer, you can use ANCOVA. This is in simple terms a general multivariable regression model on a continuous dependent variable and independent variables being categorical - as in your case. Here, you can also add the other variables you have listed. I believe the ANCOVA does not take possible interactions between variables into consideration, but I think you can add that in SPSS from my sparse usage of SPSS. If you want to use SPSS to perform an ANCOVA, I would suggest looking at this site as it describes the assumptions (very important!) prior to the regression and the interpretation afterward. Let me know if you need a more detailed guide from that site.

I think what Sergio is alluding to is a priori reflection of your variables and hypothesis. Of course, one could add more and more variables related to gender, culture etc. But, if you only want to/have the listed variables that is also more than fine. Hopefully, you can then base some of your findings on Sergio's references.

Answered by Thomas on November 6, 2021

Pay attention :)

A. "The economic theory of human capital maintains that education has a causal effect on the subsequent labor market earnings of individuals. [...] The complication [...] is that economists also accept that mental ability enhances productivity as well. Thus, because those with relatively high ability are assumed to be more likely to obtain higher educational degrees, the highly educated are presumed to have higher innate ability and higher natural rates of productivity. As a result, some portion of the purported causal effect of education on earnings may instead reflect innate ability rather than any productivity-enhancing skills provided by educational institutions (see Willis and Roses, 1979)." I'm quoting from Morgan and Winship, Counterfactuals and Causal Inference, Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 15. In other words, ability is a confounder:

enter image description here

But ability is not observable and you need a proxy variable, e.g. IQ. See Wooldridge, Econometric Analysis, §4.3.2.

B. As to gender, let's assume that mothers take care of children more than fathers. Then you have to control for the number and the age of children, e.g. number of children less than six or at least six years of age. See Wooldridge, Econometric Analysis, §4.2.4.

In brief, you should know the previous literature. Papers and books that quote Willis and Roses (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=7392153338380430831&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=it) could be a good starting point.

Answered by Sergio on November 6, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP