Unit root testing in Eviews

I’ve plotted my data log(GDP) which displays an albeit small upward trend. However, after performing an ADF unit root test log(GDP) it suggests that I can reject H0 [that there is a unit root] at the 5% level. I tested the level effect with trend and intercept due to the nature of the graph. Both the intercept and trend are statistically significant and removing the trend only makes the t statistic lower so that you can reject H0 at the 1% level.

Why might I be getting this result as from the graph the data definitely looks nonstationary.

Economics Asked on December 29, 2020

I think the source of your confusion may be due to the inclusion of the linear trend term in your test. If you exclude the linear trend from the test then you will almost certainly find evidence of a unit root. There is actually an open debate as to whether GDP is trend stationary (i.e. stationary once you remove the linear trend) or difference stationary (i.e. stationary once you take a difference of the series). For example, see: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=866624

To help you better understand it is possible to illustrate this with a simple model with a lag and a trend (this also generalizes for two lags but it is good to keep things simple). Consider the following model of GDP:

$$y_{t}=alpha+beta y_{t-1}+gamma t+e_{t}$$

If we subtract $$y_{t-1}$$ from both sides we get that

$$Delta y_{t}=alpha+(beta-1) y_{t-1}+gamma t+e_{t}$$

where the null hypothesis of our unit root test is that $$(1-beta)=0$$. The test depends on whether we account for the constant ($$alpha$$) and the linear trend ($$gamma$$) or not. If the true process has a linear trend but $$beta<1$$ then you will not detect a unit root when including a linear trend in the test. On the other hand if you estimate the model without a linear trend and conduct the unit root test without an exogenous linear trend then the unit root test should not reject the null since the estimate for $$beta$$ will move towards 1 to try and capture the linear trend. For this same reason if you have large structural breaks in the data the estimate of $$beta$$ will move towards 1 and suggest evidence of a unit root (regardless of an inclusion or a linear trend or not).

Long story short if you include the linear trend in the test even if you exclude it from the estimated regression model then you are unlikely to find evidence of a unit root in an empirical process where a linear trend dominates unless the data were even more non-stationary than it appears.

Answered by Andrew M on December 29, 2020

On surface level there does not seem to be anything wrong with the test.

There might be a breakpoint in your series but that should bias the unit root test in favor of the null hypothesis of non-stationarity (although you might still want to check that and use some breakpoint unit root test in that case).

Also, even if you do everything right you might still get significant result even if we know that GDP should have unit root. This is statistics - the test is not some sort of truth checking machine it is all based on probability. For example, with p value 0.0186 even if your test has power 1 you would expect about 2 false positives out of 100 tests. Moreover, you definitely won’t have 1 power and with ADF test you usually need a lot of observations to get to 0.8 power which is considered good so the probability the result is not correct is even higher. You might want to try to run some alternative unit root test with null of stationarity and alternative of unit root (for example KPSS test). In any case when building some regressions I would always assume that GDP has a unit root due to overwhelming evidence from other studies and not just rely on the unit root test.

Answered by 1muflon1 on December 29, 2020

Related Questions

What’s a “relative pair trade” for currencies?

1  Asked on September 27, 2021

How do personal finance banking apps make money?

0  Asked on September 27, 2021

Need help with Wakker (2010) on arbitrage

0  Asked on September 26, 2021 by eric-3toedsloth

Why does fiat money have value?

5  Asked on September 26, 2021

What was the “invariable measure of value” problem and how did Sraffa solve it?

1  Asked on September 25, 2021 by user16353

Why do high earning multiples imply a likelihood of low or even negative returns?

0  Asked on September 25, 2021

Why would banks not want to lend, under Federal Reserve’s Main Street Lending Program?

1  Asked on September 25, 2021

market for lemons with signals – equilibriums vs constraints

1  Asked on September 5, 2021 by raccoon

What does Eugene Fama mean “variance of price changes over multiple days should be less than the multiple of the variance over a day”?

1  Asked on September 5, 2021

Why are real median household incomes stagnant?

5  Asked on September 5, 2021

Balance of payments and the free floating exchange rate system

1  Asked on September 4, 2021

inflation rate vs interest rate on calculating present value of future money

2  Asked on September 3, 2021

Why is money in circulation a liability of the central bank?

3  Asked on September 2, 2021 by kiran-yallabandi

Relation between demands of $x, y$ and $z$

3  Asked on September 2, 2021

Can implicit costs make every option not worth doing?

1  Asked on September 2, 2021

How does John Stuart Mill distinguish between “wealth” and “riches”?

2  Asked on September 2, 2021 by user23101

Is Currency Devaluation a cause or effect of interest rates?

1  Asked on September 2, 2021 by raj-mehta

Does working abroad cause less unemployment? Or is it actually harmful (directly or opportunity cost)?

2  Asked on September 2, 2021

Proof of excess community demand function in Sonnenschein (1973)

0  Asked on September 2, 2021 by ryan-da-silva

Indifference curve – Does $dU = 0$ hold in higher dimensions? / Problem of integrability

1  Asked on September 2, 2021