Why does stress act a point instead of on an entire area normal to the stress?

Engineering Asked on January 4, 2022

I’ve often heard stress acts at a point and not on an entire cross-sectional area to which the load is applied normally.
Im a little confused here, Let us consider an area of cross-section A and let a load P be applied normal to A resulting in stress s.
Does this mean-

  1. s acts at a point on A and not on the entire A? If yes, why?
  2. Is the value of s the same at all points on A?
  3. Isn’t A significant to s?

2 Answers

Imagine you have a steel column as a solid square of 6-inch by 6-inch section carrying a load P sitting on a square base plate, 12-inch by 12-inch.

The normal stress on the base plate is not $ sigma= frac {P}{12^2} $

The stress due to the P on the baseplate will be a complex mixture of normal stress, shear stress and bending (moment) stress.

if we consider just the normal stress on the baseplate it follows a pattern of concentric roundish square contour lines which are degrading in intensity as they open farther. I attach a crude diagram here, approximately showing the spread of stress contours.

stress under the column

That is why we consider the stress locally just for a point. In this case, we want to make sure the maximum normal stress is below the allowed stress, not the average stress. The distribution of normal stress into the depth of the plate is a bit complicates but basically the stress opens into the depth following an exponential spiral profile.

In many of the structural members like beams, stress increases linearly vertically as the point is farther from neutral axis of the beam. There are however structural members much more sophisticated than a simple beam where the stress varies greatly on a different point of a section, eg, cranck shaft of a car engine. Some members have almost uniform stress load across their cross-section, eg, a truss tension member at a point not very near its joint.

Answered by kamran on January 4, 2022

In general, the stress can change from point to point on a surface.

If you have a flat surface with a uniform pressure load applied to it, the normal component of the stress must equal the pressure everywhere to maintain equilibrium, but there can also be shear stress components at the surface which are not constant over the whole surface.

For example, consider a cantilever beam with a uniform distributed load applied along its length. The shear stress at the surface (which is the same thing as the "axial stress" in the beam which you calculate using $My/I$) varies from zero at the free end to a maximum value at the fixed end. And when dealing with beams, you don't usually bother about the direct stress component caused by the uniform load at all, because it is small compared with the axial stress.

Answered by alephzero on January 4, 2022

Add your own answers!

Related Questions

Physical Significance

1  Asked on April 16, 2021 by e-mackel


Magnetomotive forces acting on assembly

0  Asked on April 14, 2021 by andrew-micallef


Compound Microscope recommendation

2  Asked on April 13, 2021 by k_lash96


How to stop the leakage from the design?

1  Asked on April 13, 2021 by anwar-elhadad


Are tetrahedron spaceframes strong versus flex?

1  Asked on April 11, 2021 by timothy-hyer-devine


Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2022 All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, MenuIva, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP, SolveDir