"If he come" vs. "If he comes"

Question

I've found the following on the internet (https://www.jstor.org/stable/43344096) :

(1). If he comes, I shall go.
(2). If he come, I shall go.

Here, the first sentence is in indicative mood, and the second one is in subjunctive mood.
What's the difference in meaning between these two sentences?
Edit: Though the second sentence seems ungrammatical to me, I have also found these in a school grammar book, "The Best Guide for Madhyamik English" by A. K. Chatterjee. Therefore, I would like to know what the native speakers think of these.

DW256 · Answer

Consistent with its non-factual status, the if... verb may be in the plain form, marking the subjunctive construction. Subjunctive in conditionals is rare, especially with verb-forms other than be. It belongs to the formal style and verges on archaic. (CaGEL p1000)

In the first sentence if he comes is an open conditional: his coming is not viewed as unlikely. In the second if he come also falls into the category of open conditionals, and similarly the speaker would not think his coming unlikely (CaGEL p745).

So, it seems there is little difference in meaning, but a clear difference in style: the first being idiomatic present-day English, and the second being formal or even archaic.

To my ears, the second sounds absolutely unacceptable in any context whatsoever.

"If he come" vs. "If he comes"

One Answer

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question