TransWikia.com

Is there a word I can use to replace textual "finger quotes" instead of 'per se'?

English Language & Usage Asked by txtechhelp on September 26, 2021

When it comes to writing, I don’t like to use the phrase per se, as it’s hard to fit into what I’m trying to explain sometimes, but I don’t like using quotes to mean per se (what I’m referring to as the textual "finger quotes").

For example, take this sentence fragment I wrote to explain an abstract idea of multiple parts interconnected:

… since it could be considered a "part" of the current context …

In this fragment, I’m using the word part in quotes to mean the same as:

… since it could be considered a part, per se, of the current context …

I try not to use quotes likes this when I’m writing an explanation, but usually my other option is to use the phrase per se, which I don’t usually like writing as it doesn’t necessarily exactly convey the meaning sometimes. I feel, too, that italicizing or bolding the word would give it undo emphasis.

Is there a word, phrase, or possible styling that I could use instead, or is it considered acceptable to use quotes in this way?

I should note that I’m talking about informal communications, like e-mails, texts, etc. as I wouldn’t use quotes in this way if I were to write an article/book or something that would be published.

One Answer

It seems best not to think with air quotes when writing.

Your statement "... since it could be considered a part of the current context" is good as is. "could be considered" seems equivalent to the proverbial air quotes.

Correct answer by PiCat on September 26, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP