Nepos' Themistocles: ut ingratis omnes ad depugnandum cogerentur?

Latin Language Asked by Sebastian Koppehel on August 25, 2021

I am reading the biography of Themistocles by Cornelius Nepos. He recounts the story of how Themistocles used a deceit to bring about the naval engagement that went down in history as the famous Battle of Salamis, when his compatriots, seeing Athens burn, became restless and wanted to leave the ships to defend their cities.

Themistocles sends an envoy to “the king,” which in this context always seems to be the Persian king Xerxes, with orders to tell him (correctly) that the Greek are about to disperse and that he should attack quickly now when he can beat them all in one place.

Nepos then explains the idea behind this ruse:

Hoc eo valebat, ut ingratis ad depugnandum omnes cogerentur.
This aimed at driving everybody (???) to battle.

I cannot make sense of ingratis. It seems obvious to me that it is supposed to mean something like “against their will, unwillingly.” But why the dative or ablative?

One Answer

It is a contraction of ingratiis, which means "against (their) will", from ingratia "thanklessness". Ingratiis looks like an ablative to me. Lewis & Short mention your passage.

Correct answer by Cerberus on August 25, 2021

Add your own answers!

Related Questions

-whatever suffix

1  Asked on August 25, 2021 by mykhal


A personal name ending in -ua: is it male or female?

4  Asked on August 25, 2021 by peter-robinson


“From beyond the grave”

0  Asked on January 9, 2021


Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2022 All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, MenuIva, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP, SolveDir