# Can Someone Identify This Diacritic?

Linguistics Asked by Join JBH on Codidact on October 23, 2021

My mother is working on genealogy and has run across a diacritic mark that I could swear I’ve seen before but cannot identify. Here is the last name (said to be Austrian) from two documents. It’s the mark over the second-to-last letter in the name. This first example is the gentleman’s signature.

This second example was written by an official on a naturalization form.

As I said, I could swear I’ve seen this diacritic before, but I can’t remember from where. I tried looking at Wikipedia’s diacritic mark page and Word’s international symbol fonts. I’ve even looked as a long shot on amp-what.com. The closest match seems to be a double-acute, but I’m fairly sure that’s wrong.

Can anyone identify the diacritic?

Also, this is my first posting on this Stack. If there’s a more appropriate stack for this question, I’m delighted to move the question there.

# Shankaͤr aͤ eͤ iͤ oͤ uͤ

Is equivalent to Shankär äëïöü, it's an old style germanic umlaut, and is another way of writing ä ë ï ö ü, but rarely used in modern script.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_umlaut

In blackletter handwriting, as used in German manuscripts of the later Middle Ages and also in many printed texts of the early modern period, the superscript e still had a form that would now be recognisable as an e, but in manuscript writing, umlauted vowels could be indicated by two dots since the late medieval period.

It can be used via unicode character U+0364 and the HTML entity &#868;

Answered by Tom J Nowell on October 23, 2021

This is the predecessor to the modern umlaut: a small letter "e" written above a vowel. The name looks like "Schankär" to me.

If you want to represent this very literally in Unicode, the codepoint is U+0364, "Combining Latin Small Letter E". But most people just normalize it to the easily-recognizable two dots.

Answered by Draconis on October 23, 2021

@Caimarvon and @Draconis made simple work of what's an absolute mystery to people like my family and I, who are only amateur linguists in the same way that pushing an apple onto a stick could be thought a wheel. Their insight led me to Diacritics for medieval studies by Marc Wilhelm Küster and Isabel Wojtovicz, which explained the Combining Latin Small Letter E diacritical mark (among many others).

The handling of medieval characters in the context of IT systems is problematic, especially as far as data exchange and publication in electronic media is concerned.

There is as yet no reasonably complete list which covers all characters and special symbols used in modern editions of medieval texts. In particular, there is no complete coverage of the many abbreviatures that are typical for medieval manuscripts and no study on the applicability of the character-glyph-model in this context.

This paper concentrates on one special aspect of characters in medieval studies, namely super-script letters which are used as diacritics, e. g. uͤ. These we shall call superscript letter diacritics. While it also cannot claim completeness, it covers the superscript letter diacritics which occur in major medievalistic internet projects and in a selection of important editions. It concentrates exclusively on modern editions of medieval literature and on grammars of Middle High German.

## Superscript vowels

The by far most frequent case is that of superscript vowels (and c). According to (Reichmann,1993) there can be the following letters with a superscript:

• aͦ, aͤ, aͨ, aͧ, aͮ
• oͨ, oͤ, oͮ
• uͨ, uͤ, uͦ, uͥ
• ıͤ

Most of these represent different pronunciations of the base vowel, usually, but not always, pronunciations that are in between the base vowel and the vowel which is indicated by the superscript, be the result a diphthong or an umlauted letter. Thus we can have uͦ for the /uo/ diphthong or uͤ for u umlaut.

The most frequent superscript letter diacritic is the superscript e (e) which usually designates an umlauted letter. It is regularly used in medieval texts. In modern editions it occurs very frequently in the Middle High German parts, whereas text in modern German e. g. in the annotations which appear on the same page is never written this way. Thus we can have words like »roͤmische riche« (Roman empire) and »zuͦversuͤnende« (confident) on the same page as »Übersetzer«, »übersetzt«, »sinngemäß«, »läßt« etc. Such examples can be found by the hundred, e. g. also in grammars:

So wird der Umlaut von /a/→/e/ z. T. gar nicht bezeichnet oder als〈e, ę, ei, ä, aͤ〉 angegeben, der des /a̅/→/æ/ als 〈æ, œ, ê, e〉.

In spite of this, Middle High German and modern German parts on one page are almost always typeset in the same base font. Font switching is highly unusual.

The superscript letter diacritic o is in the two hundred years of typesetting in this field distinctly regarded as an o typographically, not as a ring above. Thus only zuͦ, not zů, would be an acceptable rendering of the /uo/-diphthong.

To summarize, all of combinations of base letters with the superscript letter diacritics a, c, e, i, o, u, v modify the sound value of the base letter in a significant and predictable way. These diacritics were a regular part of both the original Middle High German orthography and (more importantly) of current editorial practice in the complete field of medieval studies and German dialectology. Since quite a number of these projects also are active in electronic data processing and have an urgent need to exchange data, e. g. via the World Wide Web, these are an absolute core set of combining diacritics.

Answered by Join JBH on Codidact on October 23, 2021

## Related Questions

### What is the correct term for a “lazy L”?

1  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Is Mississippi cognate with Michigan?

1  Asked on October 23, 2021 by mitten-file

### Is there a language whose writing is 100% phonemic?

23  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Is there an English to Coptic translator online?

3  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Right node raising

1  Asked on October 23, 2021 by peony-fung

### Do there exist any Phoenician or Etruscan dictionaries online?

5  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Any reasons for unexplained centumization in Balto-Slavic?

1  Asked on October 23, 2021 by yellow-sky

### How to find F0, F1, F2,

1  Asked on October 23, 2021 by artur-fortunato

### Did Old English have a similar adverb phrase or interjection like “of course”?

0  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Why are some Russian and Swedish words so strikingly similar? Два – två, по-шведски – på svenska, etc

6  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Are zzz’s associated with sleeping outside of english-speaking cultures?

3  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Is h↓ the correct IPA representation of the ingressive “fast gasp”, meaning “uh-huh”, in French?

1  Asked on October 23, 2021 by scott-deerwester

### Are there any studies on some English passive verb constructions currently being replaced by new intransitive senses?

0  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Is there a sound change from [ɡ] to [i] or [j]?

5  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Has the development of double consonants in Latin been studied?

0  Asked on October 23, 2021

### What are the phonological rules or constraints for these pairs of words?

1  Asked on October 23, 2021

### Is the Ethiopian word “falash[a]” related to the words Philistine or Palestine?

1  Asked on October 23, 2021 by geoff-nixon

### A question about connotation meaning and denotation meaning

1  Asked on October 23, 2021 by ronghe

### What kind of i-mutation is PG mahtiz OE meaht?

0  Asked on October 23, 2021 by nastenka

### Norwegian Translation Codes (no, nn, nb) – Which to use on a website?

2  Asked on October 23, 2021 by pepper-seattle