Know and Factivity

Question

Consider the following sentence:

(1) I don't know that John kissed Mary.

When I assert this sentence, am I contradicting myself? The reason is as follows: following Stalnaker's view on the factivity of know, by asserting (1), I presuppose that the embedded sentence "John kissed Mary" is true. In other words, in asserting (1), I am in fact undertaking a prior commitment to the fact that John kissed Mary, namely:

(2) (It's a fact that) John kissed Mary.

But if that is the case, how the assertion of (1) is possible? If (1) is possible, then by conjoining (2) and (1), a Moorean sentence arises:

(3) %John kissed Mary, but I don't know that.

However, (3) is trivially odd. This rules out the possibility of asserting (1). But clearly (1) can be asserted and in fact we can find many sentences of the form "I don't know that ..." in ordinary discourse.
Does anyone have idea about the problem presented by the above examples? Thanks in advance!

CoffeeBaconAddict · Answer

Could we be looking at this from a different or incorrect view, but I do not think you are contradicting yourself.
I read your comment about  "I don't know that John kissed Mary." to mean...
You as a person, could have been asked "Why did John kiss Mary" you could reply " I don't know that John kissed Mary." Implying that you don't "know" that it happened only that it was a rumor and you are distancing yourself from the fact or stating you don't have proof that he kissed her.
"I don't know that John kissed Mary." could imply you don't know who kissed who, Maybe she kissed him?
"I don't know that John kissed Mary." could be thought of in the line of a detective reviewing evidence of a crime of passion, "Why did John kiss Mary" from evidence that his lips had lipstick and she is known for wearing lipstick of the same color. The detecive could be questioning what was previously thought as a known fact and now he is looking for supportive evidence "that John kissed Mary" because John could be a cross dresser which would give reason for why he had lipstick on. Or it could support a theory that Judy kissed John which is why he had the lipstick and he never did kiss Mary.
I'm reaching for different ideas but hopefully this helps stir the creative juices?

Know and Factivity

One Answer

Add your own answers!

Related Questions

Why do Chinese and Hindi have more terms for relatives than English does?

Why are there spelling inconsistencies in Southern European languages? What is the historical origin of this redundancy?

What is a markedness constraint in Optimality Theory?

save all file in window objects praat

Are there any languages that have a pronoun which is only used to refer to royalty?

Swadesh list for proto indo-european and coefficient of relatedness

Which writing systems have the highest/lowest stroke-to-sound ratios?

It’s very uncommon for Italian nouns and verbs to end in consonants, but vast number of Latin nouns and verbs do. Why?

Biggest freely available English corpus?

Data analysis of æ (tense) and æ: (lax) (Lexical Phonology)

Some questions about counterbleeding

Why are negative verbs/sentences commonly used in invitations and suggestions?

Why does linguistics focus on spoken languages rather than written ones?

Term for conversational actions meant to influence emotional state

Was it ever common to pronounce “wife’s” as “wives”?

Can Someone Identify This Diacritic?

Is there a term for translating a word to a language that has a different alphabet (such as Hindi to English)?

Is the Cyrillic letter ‘Z’ the same as the number 3

Relationship between Geneva and gin?

Are there any languages in which a simple puff of air (like blowing out a candle) is phonemic?

Ask a Question