TransWikia.com

Condition for separability of $L^2_C(Z,nu)$ in Dixmier Von Neumann Algebras proof

Mathematics Asked by Jeff Rubin on January 4, 2021

I was reading up on direct integrals of Hilbert spaces and saw the section on it from Dixmier’s Von Neumann Algebras on Google Books. In Part II Chapter 1 Section 6 "Basic Properties of Direct Integrals", the Corollary to Proposition 6 reads "If $nu$ is standard, $H$ is separable." The proof’s first sentence reads "By the hypothesis on $nu$, there exists a sequence $(f_1,f_2,dots)$ of complex valued functions dense in $L^2_C(Z,nu)$." I understand how the proof goes from there, so I am really just interested in this one sentence.

First, I am assuming that $L^2_C(Z,nu)$ is the space of equivalence classes of square-integrable (with respect to $nu$) complex-valued functions on $Z$, where functions equal $nu$-almost everywhere are in the same equivalence class. In other words, I assume the subscript $C$ means values in $mathbb{C}$. Is that right?

Second, I know the definition of $nu$ being standard is that $Z-N$ is standard for some set $N$ contained in a measurable set of $nu$-measure $0$. And I know that a Borel space $(Z,mathscr{B})$ is standard if $mathscr{B}$ is the $sigma$-algebra of Borel sets of a Polish space. Finally, I understand that a Polish space is a topological space whose topology is second countable and compatible with a complete metric.

Next, I know that Dixmier assumes that $nu$ is countably additive and $sigma$-finite. As an example, he states that if "$Z$ is a locally compact space [and I think he meant to include Hausdorff in that description], countable at infinity [which I understand means the same as $sigma$-compact], a positive (Radon) measure on $Z$, regarded as a function on the set of Borel sets of $Z$, is a positive measure in the above sense. When $Z$ is second countable, this measure is standard."
Now I’ve seen some different definitions of a Radon measure, but as I understand it, we are just trying to get enough regularity to be able to prove some things (like the separability referenced above).

Now, I am not trying to study von Neumann algebras, or anything where I need the precision of standard spaces and Polish spaces. Nor am I interested in Bourbaki’s definition of a measure on a locally compact space as a linear functional on a certain inductive limit of function spaces on compact sets.
I am just interested right now in conditions on a Borel measure space $(Z,mathscr{B},nu)$ such that $L^2(nu)$ is separable. I know a proof if $Z$ is $mathbb{R}^n$, but it requires the use of complex valued polynomials in $n$ variables. But if $Z$ is not a subset of $mathbb{R}^n$ or even of $mathbb{C}^n$, then that’s not going to work.

So suppose I restrict $Z$ to being a second countable locally compact Hausdorff space which is $sigma$-compact, and that $nu$ is a $sigma$-finite positive Borel measure on the Borel sets of $Z$. What regularity assumptions do I need to make on $nu$ to be able to prove that $L^2(Z,mathscr{B},nu)$ is separable and how does the proof go? If possible, please exhibit a proof that does not depend on "known" facts about Radon measures and Polish or standard spaces. Please feel
free to assume I know that $C_c(Z)$ is dense in $L^2(nu)$ if $nu$ is regular. (Actually I think that one can get by with inner and outer regularity just for sets of finite measure, and maybe also that compact sets have finite measure.) Also, anything else from Rudin Real and Complex Analysis is OK.
Thanks

One Answer

In order to make answering the question easier for me, I am going to change the terminology a little bit. I will prove the following:

Theorem. Let $X$ be a locally compact second countable Hausdorff space, let $mathscr{B}$ be the Borel sets of $X$, and let $mu$ be a positive measure on $mathscr{B}$ which has the following regularity properties:

  1. $mu(K)<infty$ for every compact set $Ksubseteq X$.
  2. if $Einmathscr{B}$ and $mu(E)<infty$ then $$mu(E)=inf,{mu(V)colon Esubseteq V,text{ $V$ open}}.$$
  3. if $Einmathscr{B}$ and $mu(E)<infty$ then $$mu(E)=sup,{mu(K)colon Ksubseteq E,text{ $K$ compact}}.$$ [Property (2) would normally be called outer regularity for Borel sets of finite measure, while (3) would be called inner regularity for Borel sets of finite measure.]

Then $L^p(mu)=L^p(X,mathscr{B},mu)$ is separable for $1leq p<infty$.

I will frequently cite references to the following texts:

  • KGT: Kelley, General Topology
  • LANG: Lang, Real and Functional Analysis, Third Edition
  • RCA: Rudin, Real & Complex Analysis, Third Edition
  • RFA: Rudin, Functional Analysis, Second Edition

The key to my proof was an idea found in LANG Chapter III Section 4 Exercise 10.

Proof: Since $X$ is second countable, let $D$ be a countable base for the topology of $X$. Let $C={Uin Dcolonbar{U}text{ is compact}}$. Then $C$ is also a countable base, for if $xin V$, an open subset of $X$, then ${x}$ is compact, so by RCA 2.7, there exists an open set $W$ such that $bar{W}$ is compact and $xin Wsubseteqbar{W}subseteq V$. Then, for some $Uin D$, $xin Usubseteq Wsubseteq V$, so $bar{U}subseteqbar{W}$ and hence $bar{U}$ is compact, and therefore $Uin C$. Write $C={U_1,U_2,dots}$.

This next part is taken from the proof of LANG Chapter IX Theorem 5.3. We will construct, inductively, a sequence of integers $0=j_1<j_2<cdots$ and a sequence $K_1,K_2,dots$ of compact sets such that for $i=1,2,dots$, begin{equation*} K_i=bar{U}_1cupdotscupbar{U}_{j_i+1} subseteq K_{i+1}^circqquad(i=1,2,dots). end{equation*} Let $K_1=bar{U}_1$. Suppose we have constructed $j_1,dots,j_i$ and $K_1,dots,K_i$. Then $K_i$ is compact and $C$ is an open cover for $K_i$. Let $j_{i+1}$ be the smallest integer greater than $j_i$ such that $K_isubseteq U_1cupdotscup U_{j_{i+1}}$, and let $K_{i+1}=bar{U}_1cupdotscupbar{U}_{j_{i+1}+1}$, which is compact. Then begin{equation*} K_isubseteq U_1cupdotscup U_{j_{i+1}}text{ open } subseteqbar{U}_1cupdotscupbar{U}_{j_{i+1}}cupbar{U}_{j_{i+1}+1}, end{equation*} so $K_isubseteq(bar{U}_1cupdotscupbar{U}_{j_{i+1}+1})^circ=K_{i+1}^circ$. If $xin X$ then $xin U_k$ for some $k$. Let $i$ be such that $j_igeq k$. Then $xin U_ksubseteqbar{U}_1cupdotscupbar{U}_{j_i}cupbar{U}_{j_i+1}=K_i$, so $$X=bigcup_{i=1}^infty K_i;$$ that is, $X$ is $sigma$-compact.

Fix $i$ and set $S=K_i$. $S$ is a second countable compact Hausdorff space, being a subset of $X$, which itself is second countable Hausdorff. Therefore $S$ is a $T_1$ space and so by KGT 5.9, $S$ is normal, and hence regular, since it is $T_1$. Therefore, by KGT 4.16 (Urysohn Metrization Theorem), $S$ is metrizable. Let $d$ be a compatible metric, and by KGT 4.13, we may assume that $d(s,t)leq 1$ for all $s,tin S$. By KGT 1.14, let ${s_1,s_2,dots}$ be a countable dense set of distinct elements of $S$. For $n=1,2,dots$, define $g_ncolon Stomathbb{C}$ by $g_n(s)=d(s,s_n)$. By KGT 4.8, $g_nin C(S)$, and we have that $0leq g_n(s)leq 1$ for all $sin S$. Let $B$ be the subalgebra of $C(S)$ consisting of all polynomials with complex coefficients in a finite number of variables, evaluated on a finite subset of ${g_1,g_2,dots}$. That is, they are polynomials in the $k$ variables $g_{n_1},dots,g_{n_k}$ for all possible selections of $k$ members of ${g_1,g_2,dots}$, for $k=1,2,dots$. $B$ is self-adjoint (see RFA 5.7(b) for terminology) as all we have to do is to take the complex conjugate of the coefficients since the $g_n$ are all real. If $s,tin S$ with $sneq t$, let $epsilon=d(s,t)>0$. Then for some $n$, $d(s,s_n)<epsilon/2$. Now $epsilon=d(s,t)leq d(s,s_n)+d(t,s_n)$ so $$g_n(t)=d(t,s_n)geqepsilon-d(s,s_n)>epsilon/2>d(s,s_n)=g_n(s),$$ and hence $B$ separates points on $S$. If $sin S$, then $f(s)neq 0$ for the constant polynomial $f=1$ in $B$. Therefore, by RFA 5.7 (Stone-Weierstrass Theorem), $B$ is dense in $C(S)$ in the $sup$ norm. If we let $check{B}$ be defined just as $B$ was, but we restrict the coefficients to be complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are rational (such a number is called rational complex), then $check{B}$ is countable. A polynomial in $check{B}$ of degree $N$ in $k$ variables is of the form $$check{p}(g)=sum_{lvertalpharvertleq N}q_alpha g^alpha,$$ where $alpha$ is a multi-index (see RFA 1.34 for the definition), $g=(g_{n_1},dots,g_{n_k})$, and $Re q_alpha,Im q_alphainmathbb{Q}$.

Let $epsilon>0$ be given along with a polynomial $pin B$, say $$p(g)=sum_{lvertalpharvertleq N}c_alpha g^alpha,$$ where $c_alpha$ is a complex number for each $alpha$ such that $lvertalpharvert<N$ and $g=(g_{n_1},dots,g_{n_k})$. Then $lvert g_{n_j}(s)rvertleq 1$ for all $sin S$ and $j=1,dots,k$, so for $sin S$ and $lvertalpharvertleq N$, begin{equation*} lvert g^alpha(s)rvert =lvert g_{n_1}^{alpha_1}(s)cdots g_{n_k}^{alpha_k}(s)rvertleq 1 qquad(sin S,,lvertalpharvertleq N). end{equation*} Then, if for each $alpha$ such that $lvertalpharvertleq N$, a rational complex number $q_alpha$ is chosen such that $$lvert c_alpha-q_alpharvert<frac{epsilon}{(N+1)^k},$$ then for all $sin S$, begin{equation*} lvert(p(g))(s)-(check{p}(g))(s)rvert leqsum_{lvertalpharvertleq N}lvert c_alpha-q_alpharvert,lvert g^alpha(s)rvert <sum_{lvertalpharvertleq N}frac{epsilon}{(N+1)^k}<epsilon, end{equation*} so $check{B}$ is dense in $B$ and hence also in $C(S)$, so $C(S)$ is separable. Thus $C(K_i)$ is separable for $i=1,2,dots$, with a countable dense set $check{B}_i$ of polynomials.

Zero extend every $check{p}incheck{B}_i$ to a function $p^*$ on $X$. Let $P_i={p^*coloncheck{p}incheck{B}_i}$ and put $$P=bigcup_{i=1}^infty P_i.$$ Then $P$ is countable and $Psubseteq L^p(mu)$ since $p^*$ is bounded and $mu(K_i)<infty$. Let $fin L^p(mu)$ and let $epsilon>0$ be given. By RCA 3.14, $C_c(X)$ is dense in $L^p(mu)$ [please note that the regularity conditions on $mu$ required by the proof of RCA 3.14 are precisely those listed as 1-3 in the statement of the theorem], so there exists a $gin C_c(X)$ such that $lvertlvert f-grvertrvert_p<epsilon/2$. Let $K$ be the support of $g$. Then $K$ is compact. If $xin Ksubseteq X$, then $xin K_isubseteq K_{i+1}^circ$ for some $i$. Therefore ${K_{i+1}^circcolon Kcap K_{i+1}^circneqvarnothing}$ is an open cover of $K$ and so $Ksubseteq K_{i_1+1}^circcupdotscup K_{i_j+1}^circsubseteq K_{i_j+1}$ for some $i_1<dots<i_j$. Hence $g|K_{i_j+1}in C(K_{i_j+1})$. Then there exists $check{p}incheck{B}_{i_j+1}$ such that begin{equation*} sup_{sin K_{i_j+1}},lvert(g|K_{i_j+1})(s)-check{p}(s)rvert <frac{epsilon}{2(mu(K_{i_j+1})+1)^{1/p}}. end{equation*} Then $p^*in P_{i_j+1}subseteq P$ and we have that begin{equation*} sup_{xin X},lvert g(x)-p^*(x)rvert <frac{epsilon}{2(mu(K_{i_j+1})+1)^{1/p}} end{equation*} since the support $K$ of $g$ is contained in $K_{i_j+1}$ and the support of $p^*$ is contained in $K_{i_j+1}$. Hence, begin{equation*} lvertlvert g-p^*rvertrvert_p^p =int_{K_{i_j+1}}!lvert g-p^*rvert^p,dmu leqfrac{epsilon^p}{2^p(mu(K_{i_j+1})+1)}mu(K_{i_j+1}) <Bigl(frac{epsilon}{2}Bigr)^p, end{equation*} so $lvertlvert g-p^*rvertrvert_p<epsilon/2$ and hence $lvertlvert f-p^*rvertrvert_p<epsilon$.

Correct answer by Jeff Rubin on January 4, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP