Mathematics Asked by jonathan x on January 5, 2022
Is there a reason for the Laplace Transform starting at zero? Could the transform go from -1 to ∞ or 1 to ∞? I understand that the upper bound is for the sake of convergence; however, the lower bound seems fairly arbitrary. What does the Transform gain from starting at zero?
For a physicist's or engineer's perspective, let's examine what is probably the most common application of Laplace transforms in the real world. Suppose that $x(t)$, the position of a particle at time $t$ is given by the differential equation, $$ m frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} + gamma frac{dx}{dt} + k x = F(t),$$ where $F(t)$ is the force applied on the particle at time $t$. ($m$, $gamma$ and $k$ represent the particle's mass, the friction and the strength of the restorative force respectively.)
Furthermore, we suppose that when $t < 0$, the force is zero and the system is stationary. The force is only "turned on" at time $t = 0$. Therefore, $x(t)$ and $F(t)$ are non-zero only for $t geq 0$, we only really need to solve the differential equation for $t geq 0$. (The initial conditions at $t = 0$ are $x(0) = 0$ and $frac{dx}{dt}(0) = 0$.)
We can solve this equation using Laplace transforms. Taking Laplace transforms of both sides, the differential equation turns into an algebraic equation which is easier to solve. Once we have solved this algebraic equation, we invert the Laplace transform, giving the final answer, $$ x(t) = mathcal L^{-1} left[ frac{mathcal L[F](s)}{ms^2 + gamma s + k}right].$$
But the thing I want to draw your attention to is the fact that, in the context of this physics problem, the $x(t)$ and the $F(t)$ are only non-zero when $t geq 0$. So when you define their Laplace transforms, it is only natural to integrate over $t geq 0$: $$ mathcal L[x](s) := int_0^infty e^{-ts} x(t) dt, mathcal L[F](s) := int_0^infty e^{-ts} F(t) dt.$$ Integrating over the whole of $mathbb R$ is pointless, seeing that $x(t)$ and $F(t)$ are zero when $t < 0$ anyway! So in the context of this physics problem, it is natural to define the Laplace transforms using integrals over $[0, infty)$.
Answered by Kenny Wong on January 5, 2022
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by tota
abelian groups cyclic groups group homomorphism group theory monomorphisms
4 Asked on January 25, 2021
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by michael-blane
abstract algebra ceiling and floor functions combinatorics permutations problem solving
0 Asked on January 25, 2021 by yolbarsop
approximation asymptotics integration riemann sum sequences and series
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by bellow
9 Asked on January 25, 2021 by user1551
function and relation composition functional equations functions real analysis
2 Asked on January 25, 2021 by cardinal
2 Asked on January 25, 2021 by gene
functional analysis linear algebra matrices norm spectral theory
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by gal-ben-ayun
0 Asked on January 25, 2021 by jyothi-jain
0 Asked on January 25, 2021 by eyesima
elementary set theory notation proof writing solution verification
6 Asked on January 24, 2021 by user713999
1 Asked on January 24, 2021
1 Asked on January 24, 2021 by scott-frazier
1 Asked on January 24, 2021
1 Asked on January 24, 2021 by methodcl
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2023 AnswerBun.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP