Mathematics Asked by user13985 on November 3, 2020
Is this statement true?
$$bftext{Every oscillating sequence diverges.}$$
My thoughts: $bf{False}$. $s_n = (-1)^n$ does not converge. But it’s bounded, therefore, not divergent either. Divergent means diverging to $-infty$ or $+ infty$, yes?
Solution key: $bf{True}$. If a sequence oscillates, then its limit inferior and limit superior are unequal. If follows that it cannot converge, for if it converged all its subsequences would converge to the same limit.
Three other places discussing oscillating convergence:
This website says: "Oscillating sequences are not convergent or
divergent. Such as 1, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 7,…" I agree.
This SE post says: "Diverge means doesn’t converge." But, I
think it can be neither?
This SE post says: "$sin xe^{-x}$ is oscillating and
convergent." I agree.
So, is the solution key correct? Who’s right here?
This depends on your definition of oscillation of sequences.According to the Wikipedia page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscillation_(mathematics)#Oscillation_of_a_sequence, the oscillation is zero if and only if the sequence converges. So the answer key is correct because the difference between limit superior and the limit inferior is non-zero and hence the oscillation is non-zero, and so the sequence does not converge.
Answered by Poorwelsh on November 3, 2020
In the usual definitions that I have picked up from various instructors and textbooks, "this sequence diverges" just means "this sequence doesn't converge". You could self-consistently define things the other way, but this is unusual in my experience.
By contrast, "this sequence oscillates" is usually not rigorously defined. Thus when we somewhat casually say "this sequence doesn't converge because it oscillates forever" we really mean "this sequence doesn't converge because it oscillates with an amplitude bounded away from zero forever". With no formal definition setting the context, I would probably say that $frac{(-1)^n}{n}$ both oscillates and converges.
Answered by Ian on November 3, 2020
You have to be very precise with your definitions. Generally, we call a sequence divergent if it does not converge. This means that convergent and divergent are each other's opposite.
As far as I know, there is no accepted definition for oscillating sequence.
The sequence $(-1)^n$ diverges, because it does not converge, while the sequence $frac{(-1)^n}{n}$ converges to zero. Depending on the precise definition, you may or may not call the latter sequence oscillating, so you have to consult your textbook there.
Answered by Wizact on November 3, 2020
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by tota
abelian groups cyclic groups group homomorphism group theory monomorphisms
4 Asked on January 25, 2021
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by michael-blane
abstract algebra ceiling and floor functions combinatorics permutations problem solving
0 Asked on January 25, 2021 by yolbarsop
approximation asymptotics integration riemann sum sequences and series
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by bellow
9 Asked on January 25, 2021 by user1551
function and relation composition functional equations functions real analysis
2 Asked on January 25, 2021 by cardinal
2 Asked on January 25, 2021 by gene
functional analysis linear algebra matrices norm spectral theory
1 Asked on January 25, 2021 by gal-ben-ayun
0 Asked on January 25, 2021 by jyothi-jain
0 Asked on January 25, 2021 by eyesima
elementary set theory notation proof writing solution verification
6 Asked on January 24, 2021 by user713999
1 Asked on January 24, 2021
1 Asked on January 24, 2021 by scott-frazier
1 Asked on January 24, 2021
1 Asked on January 24, 2021 by methodcl
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2022 AnswerBun.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, MenuIva, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP