What is an example of a smooth variety over a finite field F_p which does not embed into a smooth scheme over Z_p?

Such an example of course could not be projective and would not itself lift to Z_p. The context is that one can compute p-adic cohomology of a variety X over a finite field F_p via the cohomology of an embedding of X into a smooth Z_p scheme.

This is similar in spirit to my questions here and here (but a different question than the second link).

MathOverflow Asked by David Zureick-Brown on August 9, 2020

EDIT 7/15/14 I was just looking back at this old answer, and I don't think I ever answered the stated question. I can't delete an accepted answer, but I'll point at that, as far as I can tell, the Vakil reference I give also only address the question of deforming $X$ over $mathbb{Z}_p$, not of embedding it in some larger flat family over $mathbb{Z}_p$.

EDIT Oops! David Brown points out below that I misread the question. I was answering the question of finding a smooth scheme which does not deform in a smooth family over Z_p.

Well, to make up for that, I'll point to some references which definitely contain answers. Look at section 2.3 of Ravi Vakil's paper on Murphy's law for deformation spaces http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/0411.5469 for some history, and several good references. Moreover, Ravi describes how to build an explicit cover of P^2 in characteristic p which does not deform to characteristic 0. Basically, the idea is to take a collection of lines in P^2 which doesn't deform to characteristic 0 and take a branched cover over those lines. For example, you could take that p^2+p+1 lines that have coefficients in F_p.

Correct answer by David E Speyer on August 9, 2020

A theorem of Wlodarczyk in "Embedding varieties in toric varieties" says that any smooth variety such that any two points are contained in an affine open set can be embedded in a smooth toric variety. Toric varieties can be lifted to Z_p so any variety over F_p with the above property can be embedded in a smooth scheme over Z_p.

Unfortunately, not all smooth varieties have this property; the example in Hartshorne of a smooth proper 3-fold which is not projective appears to be one where this fails (though for suitable choices these could lift to Z_p).

Answered by ulrich on August 9, 2020

I know that Kiran Kedlaya knows the answer to this question. You might e-mail him.

Answered by David E Speyer on August 9, 2020

Related Questions

Examples of $aleph_0$-categorical nonhomogeneous structures

2  Asked on November 3, 2021

Extending a holomorphic vector bundle: a reference request

1  Asked on November 3, 2021 by alex-gavrilov

Closed walks on an $n$-cube and alternating permutations

2  Asked on November 3, 2021 by bryanjaeho

Bounded non-symmetric domains covering a compact manifold

1  Asked on November 3, 2021 by diverietti

Residues in several complex variables

2  Asked on November 3, 2021 by bananeen

What kinds of papers does the Indiana University Mathematics Journal publish?

1  Asked on November 3, 2021

Is there a definable model of PA whose domain is a proper class and whose complete theory is not definable?

0  Asked on November 3, 2021 by guy-crouchback

Which field extensions do not affect Chow groups?

0  Asked on November 3, 2021 by mikhail-bondarko

Reference for topological graph theory (research / problem-oriented)

7  Asked on November 3, 2021

Is a direct sum of flabby sheaves flabby?

1  Asked on November 3, 2021

Algebraicity of a ratio of values of the Gamma function

1  Asked on November 3, 2021 by jecl

Classification of subgroups of finitely generated abelian groups

2  Asked on November 3, 2021

An enumeration problem for Dyck paths from homological algebra

1  Asked on November 3, 2021

Circular track riddle

1  Asked on November 3, 2021

Fundamental group of a compact branched cover

2  Asked on November 3, 2021

How do you know that you have succeeded-Constructive Quantum Field Theory and Lagrangian

2  Asked on November 3, 2021

Does Morita theory hint higher modules for noncommutative ring?

3  Asked on November 3, 2021

Bounding the smallest eigenvalue of a matrix generated by a positive definite function

1  Asked on November 3, 2021 by rajesh-d