# How accurate are the most accurate calculations?

Matter Modeling Asked by Roman Korol on December 13, 2021

Taking into account the fact that the theory of quantum gravity does not exist and the QED calculations are not possible for most realistic chemical systems, what levels of accuracy can we expect from a theoretical calculation on simple (small) materials? Examples that come to mind are:

1. Simplest molecular materials: $$^3ce{He}$$, $$^4ce{He}$$, $$ce{H_2}$$.
2. Simplest periodic systems, i.e. metallic $$ce{Li}$$.

## Exhibit 1: Ground state hyperfine splitting of the H atom:

1420405751767(1) mHz (present most accurate experiment)
142045199        mHz (present most accurate theory)


The error in the theory is due to the difficulty in treating the nuclear structure (2 up quarks + 1 down).

## Exhibit 2: Ground state hyperfine splitting of the muonium atom:

4463302780(050) Hz (present most accurate experiment)
4463302880(550) Hz (present most accurate theory)


Why does it agree so well? μ$$^+$$ is a fundamental particle and therefore has no nuclear structure. QED is the correct theory for describing the interaction between pure electric charges (e$$^-$$ and μ$$^+$$). The only QFD (quantum flavordynamics) needed is for the electro-weak interaction between the particles (not for interactions within sub-nuclear particles), and QFD calculations were done here in anticipation of more accurate experiments to come.

## Exhibit 3: Ground state hyperfine splitting of the He atom:

6739701177(0016) Hz (present most accurate experiment)
6739699930(1700) Hz (present most accurate theory)


Notice how much harder it is when you add an electron.

## Exhibit 5: $$Srightarrow P$$ transition in the Li atom:

14903.632061014(5003) cm^-1 (present most accurate experiment)
14903.631765(0006670) cm^-1 (present most accurate theory)


## Exhibit 6: Ionization energy of the Li atom:

43487.15940(18) cm^-1 (present most accurate experiment)
43487.1590(080) cm^-1 (present most accurate theory)


## Exhibit 7: Ionization energy of the Be atom:

76192.64(0060) cm^-1 (present most accurate experiment)
76192.699(007) cm^-1 (present most accurate theory)


Notice that theory is 1 order of magnitude more accurate than experiment!!!

## Exhibit 8: Atomization energy of the H$$_2$$ molecule:

35999.582834(11) cm^-1 (present most accurate experiment)
35999.582820(26) cm^-1 (present most accurate theory)


## Exhibit 9: Fundamental vibration of the H$$_2$$ molecule:

4161.16632(18) cm^-1 (present most accurate experiment)
4161.16612(90) cm^-1 (present most accurate theory)


Answered by Nike Dattani on December 13, 2021

## Related Questions

### Supercell band structure unfolding advantages

2  Asked on December 23, 2020 by tristan-maxson

### How do I predict the structure of a nanoparticle with Calypso and Quantum ESPRESSO?

0  Asked on December 11, 2020

### How many GB of RAM would be needed for VASP to evaluate optical properties of a material?

1  Asked on December 5, 2020 by anibal-bezerra

### Promising functionals for transition metal chemistry

0  Asked on October 21, 2020 by andrew-rosen

### Atom legend in VESTA

1  Asked on September 26, 2020 by achintha-ihalage

### Weyl Semimetal and Dirac semimetal

1  Asked on August 19, 2020 by shahid-sattar

### Great computer graphics for matter modelling

1  Asked on August 11, 2020 by user14717

### I wrote a Python code to do MD for a Lennard-Jones fluid but the VACF is wrong: What might be the problem?

0  Asked on July 22, 2020 by user207526