I have read some articles where they recommend a direct exposure to the sun of about 20 to 30 minutes, others say that 10 to 15 minutes, another that 5 minutes is enough, etc. I suppose it depends on the geographic region, the seasons of the year, and other conditions.
However, I have found articles that state that in less than 1 minute of sun exposure, the skin begins to suffer damage (Sun Protection and Vitamin D – The Skin Cancer Foundation). In this other it is stated that the idea that you need to sunbathe to get vitamin D is a myth. This one from Yale Medicine makes a similar claim. In general, all of these articles suggest that it is better to take supplements to cover a vitamin D deficiency than to expose yourself to the sun.
I like your curiosity and logical thinking - you're just missing a few pieces of the puzzle.
The sun emits ultraviolet light radiation which is the component of sunlight that is able to damage skin.
Ultraviolet (UV) is a form of electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 10 to 400 nanometers, shorter than that of visible light but longer than X-rays. To put nanometers into perspective - A human hair is around 75,000 nanometers in diameter. There are sub-types of UV which define the wavelength size:
Interestingly UVB is essential synthesize Vitamin D.
UV light is able to damage DNA. This results with humans cells (typically skin cells) to attempt to repair themselves. As a result sometimes genetic mutations arise - some of which give the cell the ability to divide more frequently (cancer). The process of UV damage is shown in the image below.
Although advertises I'm sure would love you to believe that Vitamin D should always be gained from their supplement, the world health organisation states the following "...5 to 15 minutes of casual sun exposure of hands, face and arms two to three times a week during the summer months is sufficient to keep your vitamin D levels high.". Yes I understand - supplements avoid aforementioned damage to DNA - but you will be safe if you follow the above directive (it's free) and learn more information on other methods to prevent damage when in situations of long-term exposure.
In terms of further scientific reading I would like to direct you toward higher quality literature. This web-page explains the difference between and the best information resource out of: News articles, Journal articles and, Peer-reviewed scientific articles. In saying this, I also think Wikipedia in the 21st century has gained a highly respected and excellent reputation for free high quality information.
Correct answer by Andrew on August 29, 2021
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by eniel-rod
2 Asked on August 29, 2021
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by hinko-pih-pih
0 Asked on August 29, 2021
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by cort-ammon
0 Asked on August 29, 2021
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by john-hon
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by malgorzata-hirsz
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by live-love
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by anthony-x
0 Asked on August 29, 2021 by noeshel
1 Asked on August 29, 2021 by abrar-hossain
1 Asked on March 5, 2021 by user37849012643
1 Asked on February 22, 2021 by pushkin
1 Asked on February 8, 2021
1 Asked on January 3, 2021
2 Asked on December 18, 2020 by jones-g
1 Asked on December 14, 2020 by franck-dernoncourt
1 Asked on December 13, 2020 by blue-various
0 Asked on December 11, 2020 by chris-rogers
Get help from others!