Name of argumentation in a discussion

Philosophy Asked on January 4, 2022

Some weeks ago I was discussing with a friend. I criticized Trump about something and then my friend replied "OK, but what about Obama?". This question was aimed at removing attention from Trump and discuss about something else, which, albeit relevant, was not the main topic of the discussion. Moreover, my friend was assuming that I prefer Obama to Trump, which is not necessarily true (I might dislike them both). On top of that, he is not really saying that what Trump did was correct; he just said that Obama did it too.

What I would like to know is: what is the name of this argument and how do people usually handle it? This kind of argumentation is used a lot by politicians, e.g. when criticized about something, they reply saying that the politicians from other parties did similar things (just like my friend did).

This question might not be suitable for this community, so I will apology in advance if that’s the case and I will erase the question, but I didn’t know where else to post it.

One Answer

This tu quoque fallacy is so common in political debates that it has a special name: the "whattabout" or "whattaboutism". Plentiful textbook examples of the whattabout can be found in the interactions between the press and the trumpists Huckabee, Spicer, Conway and McEnany.

Answered by niels nielsen on January 4, 2022

Add your own answers!

Related Questions

A Neo-Kantian View on Causality?

3  Asked on December 2, 2021 by user13847


Play by these rules, however broken, or create new ones

0  Asked on November 19, 2021 by adeel-ansari


Sources for possible take on the Timaeus

2  Asked on October 25, 2021


How to symbolize the following sentence

0  Asked on October 25, 2021


Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2023 All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP