# How is Newton’s third law valid in the case of a charged sphere enclosed within another charged sphere?

Physics Asked by Sasha1296 on November 23, 2020

Let’s say we have two point charges q1 and q2 both of which are positive, according to Newton’s third law the force one exerts on the othe is equal to the force the other exerts on the first. Therefore

$$F_1 = q_1 E_2$$

$$F_2 = q_2 E_1$$

$$F_1= F_2$$

Therefore:

$$q_1 E_2 = q_2 E_1$$

Now let’s say that we have two concentric spheres both of which are infinitely thin and have a positive charge:

Let’s say that the inner sphere is Sphere 1 and the outer sphere is Sphere 2

According to Gauss’s law The Electric field due to sphere 2 is zero everywhere inside sphere 2. The electric field due to sphere 1 is zero inside sphere 1 however it is not zero outside of it.

The force of the charges from sphere 1 acting on sphere 2 is:

$$E_{sphere1} q_{sphere2}$$

while the force of the charges from sphere 2 acting on sphere 1 is:

$$E_{sphere2} q_{sphere1}$$

However the electric field from sphere 2 is zero everywhere inside itself.

If the electric field due to sphere 1 is non-zero, and the electric field does push charges on the second sphere outward, how is Newton’s third law obeyed if the outer sphere doesn’t push back?

how is newton's third law obayed if the outer sphere doesn't push back?

Newton’s 3rd law is obeyed in many different but equivalent ways.

First, if we consider the spheres as a whole the net force on the outer sphere is zero since the force is constant and radially outward and the force on the inner sphere is also zero. Clearly $$0=-0$$. So overall, as an entire object Newton’s 3rd law holds.

Now, more interesting is to consider each individual charge. For any individual charge on the inner sphere and any individual charge on the outer sphere the force between them is given by Coulomb’s law. By Coulomb’s law the magnitude of the force is the same on each and the direction is opposite. So individually, for each pair of charges Newton’s 3rd law holds.

Finally, consider one charge on the inner sphere and the entire outer sphere. The net force on the inner charge is zero by Newton’s shell theorem, and it turns out that the net force on the shell is also zero. The part of the outer shell that the inner charge is closest to has the strongest force, but there is more charge further away. Over the entire shell the force again integrates to 0. So for every possible combination of charges, Newton’s 3rd law holds.

Now, what you may be seeing is that the stress on the outer sphere due to the inner sphere is non-zero, while the stress on the inner sphere due to the outer sphere is zero. However, Newton’s 3rd law says nothing about stresses. It only asserts that the forces are equal and opposite. The stresses are unequal, and that is perfectly consistent with Newton’s 3rd law

Correct answer by Dale on November 23, 2020

You are simplifying things too much here. To calculate the force sphere 1 exerts on sphere 2 you can't just do $$F=qE$$ because we are dealing with vectors here. In general, you will need to do an integral (sum) of all of the vector forces over sphere 2 due to all of the charges on sphere 1, and you will find that everything cancels out for the same reason that there is no net field from sphere 2 inside of sphere 2. Newton's laws still hold here.

If the spheres are concentric then you can also use a symmetry argument. The field will be constant in magnitude across sphere 2, and each point on sphere 2 will have a point on the opposite side of the sphere where the field points in the opposite direction. Therefore, everything cancels out.

Remember, electric fields follow the law of linear superposition, so since Coulomb's law for point charges follows Newton's third law, we are always guaranteed that it will also hold for electrostatic interactions of systems of many charges as well.

Answered by BioPhysicist on November 23, 2020

## Related Questions

### How to Determine the Angle Between Normal and Full Acceleration of a Body?

0  Asked on August 17, 2021 by rene-morningstar

### QFT – Bra-ket notation and correct operator interpretation

0  Asked on August 17, 2021

### Falling elevator filled with water

5  Asked on August 17, 2021

### Difference between field and wavefunction

1  Asked on August 17, 2021 by silviu

### What’s the deepest reason why QCD bound states have integer charge?

4  Asked on August 17, 2021 by mitchell-porter

### Are there galaxies with satellites in retrograde orbit?

0  Asked on August 17, 2021

### Is the number of rays projected by a source of light finite?

4  Asked on August 17, 2021 by ketan

### Two containers that have the same volume (let say 500 liter) but are different in shape

1  Asked on August 17, 2021 by limbo

### Why is measuring $M$ equivalent to measuring $UMU^{-1}$ after applying $U$?

1  Asked on August 17, 2021

### Physically, why is the ground state wavefunction of Neon be spherically symmetric?

1  Asked on August 17, 2021

### Energy of the system after displacement

2  Asked on August 17, 2021 by green_blue

### Why water heat capacity has minimum at body temperature?

2  Asked on August 17, 2021

### How would this multibody system rotate in free space?

3  Asked on August 17, 2021 by alu

### Why doesn’t the classical model of electrical conduction work with iron, cadmium and bismuth?

0  Asked on August 17, 2021 by cross

### What is this notation with an un-sandwiched comma in the subscript?

1  Asked on August 17, 2021

### Clarity on Intuition on simple mass pulley problem

1  Asked on August 17, 2021 by ashwin-sudheer

### Will the Average Kinetic Energy of ejected Electrons in Photo electric effect change with Intensity of Radiation?

1  Asked on August 17, 2021

### Why Uniqueness Explains Method Of Images

1  Asked on August 16, 2021 by luca-ion