Physics Asked by RelativisticDolphin on November 30, 2020
Let’s say we have a current loop of radius $a$ in $x-y$ plane. Let’s consider the flux ($phi=BA$) through the loop, and the flux through the rest of the plane, outside the loop. (to clarify, if the loop covers the area A, here I’m referring to the rest of the $x-y$ plane, so the entirety of $x-y$ plane from $-infty$ to $+infty$ – A).
I think the two fluxes should have the same magnitude (different sign):
All B field have to form a loop because there is no magnetic monopole, hence all the B field going through the loop has to come back down , through somewhere outside the loop.
Also using $nabla cdot textbf{B}=0$ and Gauss’s. Consider a cylinder with infinite dimensions, with its upper surface in the $x-y$ plane containing the loop, and all the other surfaces will be at infinity. Hence, the only contribution to the surface integral would be from the surface containing the loop, which has to be zero.
However, I believe my conclusion has to be wrong; using this conclusion one can calculate the self inductance of a single wire loop independent of its thickness/height, by calculating the flux through the rest of the plane, which we can do if we know the current and the radius of the loop. But the self inductance and the B field through the loop has to depend on the thickness of the loop(by Ampere’s and as other sources suggest).
Start with the vector potential $textbf{B}=textrm{curl}textbf{A}$. For a magnetic dipole $textbf{A}=frac{mu_0}{4pi}frac{mathbf{mathfrak{m}}timestextbf{r}^0 }{|textbf{r}|^2}$, this is also the asymptotic field at large distances away of any finite sized source. Now from Stokes' theorem the flux through any surface $S$ with boundary $mathcal{C}=partial S$ is $$Phi = int_{mathcal{S}}textbf{B}cdot dtextbf{S}=int_mathcal{S} textrm{curl} textbf{A} cdot d{textbf{S}} \ =oint_{mathcal{C}} textbf{A} cdot d{textbf{c}}$$ Let $mathcal{C}$ be a circle of arbitrary large radius, that is we are looking at the flux through an infinite sheet of surface, then the latter integral approaches zero for a dipole field because the perimeter is proportional to the radius while the integrand is proportional to the inverse squared radius. Then it also follows that the flux of an infinite sheet is also zero for any finite sourced magnetic field, in other words the flux threaded by any simple loop is as exactly equal to the (negative) flux threaded by the outside of that loop.
Answered by hyportnex on November 30, 2020
5 Asked on October 25, 2020 by 5-dots
charge coulombs law forces newtonian gravity newtonian mechanics
5 Asked on October 24, 2020 by nurshomik
electromagnetic radiation energy infrared radiation thermodynamics visible light
1 Asked on October 24, 2020 by 1729_sr
2 Asked on October 24, 2020 by user31058
1 Asked on October 23, 2020 by karim-chahine
conductors electronic band theory insulators topological insulators
2 Asked on October 23, 2020
1 Asked on October 22, 2020
1 Asked on October 22, 2020 by timetraveler-11
feynman diagrams particle physics s matrix theory standard model
1 Asked on October 21, 2020
coupled oscillators electromagnetic radiation resonance spring
1 Asked on October 21, 2020
1 Asked on October 21, 2020 by lauren-sin
homework and exercises kinematics relative motion vectors velocity
0 Asked on October 20, 2020 by emerson-p-l
2 Asked on October 20, 2020 by jack-hughes
1 Asked on October 20, 2020 by jan0155
bose hubbard model phase transition quantum field theory quantum mechanics superfluidity
2 Asked on October 20, 2020 by h44s
1 Asked on October 20, 2020 by quantum-spaghettification
2 Asked on October 19, 2020 by matteo-lorenzini
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2022 AnswerBun.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, MenuIva, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP, SolveDir