# Why are simple models of coupled pendulums incapable of describing irreversible energy dissipation?

Physics Asked on January 6, 2022

Consider two pendulums $$A$$ and $$B$$ coupled by a spring and also regard $$A+B$$ to be a completely isolated system. Let us start the system in an initial configuration where only one of the pendulums (say, $$A$$) is displaced keeping the other (i.e. $$B$$) at rest. As time passes, all the energy of $$A$$ is transferred to $$B$$ that was initially at rest. At one point $$A$$ comes to rest, momentarily and $$B$$ carries all the energy. Eventually, the situation reverses and the cycle continues back and forth.

In this very simple example, if we regard one of the pendulums (say, $$A$$) to be our system of interest and $$B$$ acting as its environment, we see that there is no permanent dissipation of energy of $$A$$. Even if we track the motion of $$A$$ only, its energy is not irreversibly lost to $$B$$ (its environment). It regains all of its energy periodically without any damping.

So this simple example above illustrates that just diving a compound system into two parts and keeping track of the degrees of freedom of one part only will not necessarily lead to dissipation.

The example above could be extended to a system of $$n$$ coupled oscillators. Here too, starting with a similar initial configuration, if we regard one of the oscillators to be the system, and all the other acting as its environment, the energy of A is not irreversibly lost to the remaining $$(n-1)$$ oscillators.

Question Why do these models described above fail to capture the phenomenon of dissipation? What are the feature of the environment of an actual pendulum (i.e. a real pendulum immersed in the atmosphere) and its coupling that causes its energy to be irreversibly lost to the environment (the atmosphere)?

In a model with a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, however large, energy cannot be irreversibly lost from one part of the system. However, if the Hilbert space has $$10^{10000000000}$$ dimensions, then the local energy-loss can be close enough to irreversible for all practical purposes.

The atmosphere can (and does) emit electromagnetic radiation. Some of that electromagnetic radiation escapes into space. The electromagnetic field can be viewed as a large number of oscillators, a few for each point in space. That's uncountably many oscillators if we model space as a continuum, but even if we model space as discrete, space is pretty big, so that's still a lot of oscillators. Maybe not $$10^{10000000000}$$ of them, but easily enough to make the recurrence time longer than anything we could ever hope to observe.

That's a practical answer. Regarding questions of principle, this paper has some thought-provoking things to say about recurrence times in a cosmological setting.

Answered by Chiral Anomaly on January 6, 2022

## Related Questions

### Does energy of a capacitor means energy stored in both plates?

2  Asked on July 23, 2021 by bunny-pink

### Canonical ensemble in many-body quantum mechanics

1  Asked on July 23, 2021 by user502382

### Justification for “reducing integrals” in the virial expansion for gases

1  Asked on July 23, 2021

### Why does the Gibbs free energy not decrease ad infinitum?

2  Asked on July 23, 2021

### Huygens principle and path integral for classical waves

0  Asked on July 23, 2021 by akreuzkamp

### Understanding Lorentz transformation

3  Asked on July 23, 2021

### Galaxy statistics calculation in Saslaw’s book

0  Asked on July 23, 2021 by shaz

### Can I shorten the resonant length of a tight wire by moving its endpoint in phase?

3  Asked on July 23, 2021 by artag

### How fast can an object be made to vibrate?

0  Asked on July 23, 2021 by larry

### Why do the two plates of a capacitor store equal amounts of charge?

2  Asked on July 22, 2021

### The Egg Smashing Tournament

1  Asked on July 22, 2021 by sherz1

### Variable mass systems

2  Asked on July 22, 2021

### Reconcile different definitions of temperature

3  Asked on July 22, 2021 by jane886

### What’s the formula for the brightness of a signal mirror viewed at distance X, in space?

1  Asked on July 22, 2021

### Tensor index in special relativity?

2  Asked on July 22, 2021

### Expansion after a shock wave in a de Laval nozzle

1  Asked on July 22, 2021 by wilove

### Does the sea level increase if an iceberg melts?

6  Asked on July 22, 2021

### Cylindrical coordinates of a ring

2  Asked on July 22, 2021

### What does dot product really mean?

1  Asked on July 22, 2021

### Why does potential energy time-derivative depend only on the mass flow?

2  Asked on July 22, 2021