Dental drills have always been cutting edge technology when it comes to high rotational speeds. According to Wikipedia modern drills reach more than 180 000 rotations per minute (rpm), which is 3000 rotations per second! For comparison, household drills operate at around 1000 rpm. Obviously a dental drill operates much smoother than a concrete drill, but what’s less obvious to me is why?
I could imagine that conservation of angular momentum make the rotational movement less sensitive to external forces. On the other hand a small misplacement of the center of mass with respect to the axis of rotation would cause severe juddering.
Another big difference is that the surface of the dental drill is much smoother than that of a concrete drill. Clearly, with a smoother surface there are many small impacts on the surface per second, while a rough surface leads to less, but more intense impacts. But a smooth drill being operated with low rpm would give rise to few small impacts, isn’t that even smoother? The counter-argument to this could be that to drill a hole of a certain size you need a fixed number of impacts and the patients prefer a short treatment.
What are the physical and technical arguments that high rotational speeds have unanimously prevailed in all dentist’s offices?
I got this answer from a friend who is an orthodontic surgeon.
Without consulting Wiki (incomplete article) - I can say this off the top of my head - The rpm is closer to 400 K.
The speed is needed to give the bit/burr some rotational momentum to provide torque. There is no direct connection between the source of the energy- compressed air - and the burr. The compressed air is only at about 2.7 bar and spins a turbine in the head of the drill, which the burr is attached to. You can hold the burr with your fingers stationary from start-up - no torque like a concrete bit. Another mistake in the question is that unlike a concrete drill - most of the cutting takes place on the side of the burr from a sweeping motion, not at the tip pushing down on the rotational axis.
What I described here is the high-speed air rotor. The one that makes the high pitched whine. It has water cooling and lighting (optic fibers or piezoelectric) built into the head. It is used mostly to remove enamel with minimum discomfort. The "slow" handpiece - up to 200 K rpm has a motor with direct drive through gears to the burr. Can also have water and fiber optics. Much more torque and vibration. Does not cut enamel efficiently. The motor can be driven by compressed air or electric- more control and torque- more expensive. The handpiece can be "regular " to remove caries mostly. This is known as a Contra angle handpiece. More sophisticated ones are required to place implants and do endo/root canal treatment. On the same drive system you also fit a straight handpiece used to cut bone in surgery. Then you can also cut bone with a piezoelectric handpiece or a laser.
The one type (air rotor) that I assume the question was about - is described as an "abrasive device" - not a "drill" as I pointed out. They also come in the regular head (more torque) and small to reach inaccessible areas (less torque).
Air Turbine Handpiece
An air turbine handpiece is highly valued as a dental abrasive device that rotates at a high speed, and it is an essential device for dental treatment. Since its development, many studies have been conducted to measure and evaluate rotation performance and measure and evaluate noise. An air turbine handpiece uses compressed air as the driving force and is characterized by its small size, lightweight, and painless abrading at a high rotation speed. However, compared to an electric handpiece that uses a motor as the driving force, its torque is small and the noise level is high.
As such, improved performance and reduced noise for an air turbine, handpiece are desired. Considering that an air turbine handpiece has the equivalent rotation performance as turbine performance, it can be considered as a type of turbomachinery, and the fluid mechanics approach would be effective. In other words, it would be effective to first elucidate the internal flow of an air turbine handpiece and the relation between the performance and the noise characteristics and then control the flow. However, the main component of an air turbine handpiece, the rotor, is small and rotates at high speeds (250,000–400,000 min−1); thus, measuring the flow is not easy.
The whole subject is obviously a lot more complicated than the question posed by the OP. I think my off-the-cuff answer is adequate without going into too much technical detail.
Answered by Raffles on December 4, 2020
1 Asked on July 29, 2021 by peter-j-fotopoulos
1 Asked on July 29, 2021 by cheeku
1 Asked on July 29, 2021
0 Asked on July 29, 2021
2 Asked on July 29, 2021 by sohaib-ali-alburihy
1 Asked on July 29, 2021
2 Asked on July 29, 2021 by ja_cpp
4 Asked on July 29, 2021
0 Asked on July 29, 2021 by dark-vader
0 Asked on July 29, 2021
7 Asked on July 29, 2021
1 Asked on July 29, 2021 by tinghaoliu
2 Asked on July 29, 2021 by sanskar-jain
1 Asked on July 28, 2021 by v-kiran-bharadwaj
1 Asked on July 28, 2021 by user106271
2 Asked on July 28, 2021
0 Asked on July 28, 2021 by user577674
Get help from others!