# On Girsanov Theorem to switch from Risk-Neutral to Stock Numeraire

Quantitative Finance Asked by Jan Stuller on September 27, 2020

Summary: long-story cut short, the question is asking for what types of functions $$f(.)$$, the Cameron-Martin-Girsanov theorem can be used as follows:

$$mathbb{E}^{mathbb{P}^2}[f(W_t)]=mathbb{E}^{mathbb{P}^1}left[frac{dmathbb{P}^2}{dmathbb{P}^1}f(W_t)right]$$

Long story: the Radon-Nikodym when changing from risk-neutral to Stock measure is:

$$frac{dN^{S}}{dN^{Q}}=frac{N^{Q}_{t_0}}{N^{Q}_{t}} frac{N^{S}_{t}}{N^{S}_{t_0}}=frac{1}{e^{rt}}frac{S_t}{S_{t_0}}=e^{-0.5sigma^2t+sigma W_t}$$

The following type of calc is often seen in finance:

$$mathbb{E}^{N^S}left[S_t right]=mathbb{E}^{N^Q}left[S_t^Q frac{dN^{S}}{dN^{Q}} right]=\=mathbb{E}[S_t^Q*e^{-0.5sigma^2t+sigma W_t}]=\=S_0e^{rt-0.5sigma^2t+sigma W_t}*e^{-0.5sigma^2t+sigma W_t}=\=S_0e^{rt+sigma^2t}$$

The CMG theorem tells us that the Radon-Nikodym derivative $$e^{-0.5sigma^2t+sigma W_t}$$ can be applied to $$W_t$$ directly to modify it’s drift and to create some new measure under which $$W_t$$ will no longer be a Standard Brownian motion. If we step-away from finance and denote the measure under which $$W_t$$ is standard Brownian as $$mathbb{P}^1$$, the new measure under which $$W_t$$ is a Brownian with a drift as $$mathbb{P}^2$$, and the radon-nikodym as $$frac{dmathbb{P}^2}{dmathbb{P}^1}$$, we can write:

$$mathbb{P}^2(W_t

The above is basically the definition of $$mathbb{P^2}$$ via the implicit definition of the Radon-Nikodym derivative. An extension of the above definition is that:

$$mathbb{E}^{mathbb{P}^2}[W_t]=mathbb{E}^{mathbb{P}^1}left[frac{dmathbb{P}^2}{dmathbb{P}^1}W_tright]$$

Question: in our finance case of stock, the stock price process is actually a function of $$W_t$$, so we could write $$S_t=f(W_t)$$. In the equation $$mathbb{E}^{N^S}left[S_t right]=mathbb{E}^{N^Q}left[S_t^Q frac{dN^{S}}{dN^{Q}} right]$$, we are actually using the fact that:

$$mathbb{E}^{mathbb{P}^2}[f(W_t)]=mathbb{E}^{mathbb{P}^1}left[frac{dmathbb{P}^2}{dmathbb{P}^1}f(W_t)right]$$

Is there an easy way to prove that we can do that? Obviously it does work as shown in the case of the stock price process above, because it produces the correct result. But for what $$f(.)$$ does the result hold? I am sure there must be some restrictions on the types of functions $$f(.)$$ for which the result holds true.

(I might not be answering your question, but I feel this clarification is needed.)

A random variable $$X$$ of $$(Omega, mathcal{F})$$ is a $$mathcal{F}$$-measurable function $$X : Omega → mathbf{R}$$. So, $$X$$ depends on $$Omega$$ and $$mathcal{F}$$, but does not depend on the probability measure put on $$(Omega, mathcal{F})$$. It is the distribution of $$X$$ that depends on the measure.

Given $$P1$$ and $$P_2$$ probability measures on $$(Omega, mathcal{F})$$, where $$P_2$$ is $$P_1$$-absolutely continuous on $$mathcal{F}$$ and $$L = frac{dP_2}{dP_1}$$ is the Radon-Nicodym derivative ($$mathcal{F}$$-measurable, $$mathcal{P_1}$$-integrable), we have: $$Xin L^1(Omega, P_2) iff XLin L^1(Omega, P_1).$$ In that case, we then have: $$mathbf{E}^{P_2}[X] = mathbf{E}^{P_1}[XL]$$

or in its integral form:

$$int_Omega X dP_2 = int_Omega X frac{dP_2}{dP_1} dP_1$$

(Note that there is no need to introduce notation $$X^{P_2}$$ competing with $$X$$.)

$$mathbf{E}^{P_2}[f(W_t)] = mathbf{E}^{P_2}[f(W_t^theta -int_0^t theta_u du)]$$

if $$P_2$$ is the Girsanov measure built from process $$theta$$ and $$W_t^theta = W_t +int_0^t theta_u du$$ is the induced Brownian motion under $$P_2$$ ($$W_t$$ is a Brownian motion under $$P_1$$). One can compute the expectation under $$P_2$$. Or go back to $$P_1$$ as you said:

$$mathbf{E}^{P_2}[f(W_t)] = mathbf{E}^{P_1}left[f(W_t)frac{dP_2}{dP_1} right].$$

In your case $$theta_t = sigma$$ and

$$frac{dP_2}{dP_1} =expleft(-frac{sigma^2}{2} t + sigma W_t right).$$

Answered by ir7 on September 27, 2020

## Related Questions

### Cashflow Risk vs Discount Risk

2  Asked on October 27, 2021

### Is it always better to use the entire distribution of a financial returns series, not just $mu$ and $sigma$?

1  Asked on October 27, 2021

1  Asked on October 27, 2021 by jack_t

### Joint Distribution of Correlated Variables with Markov Switching

0  Asked on October 27, 2021 by casusbelli

### Why are these deep in-the-money FLEX options seemingly bought at a discount?

2  Asked on October 27, 2021 by derek-shen

### Confusion about replicating a call option

2  Asked on October 27, 2021

### What can one do with cross-sectional relationships?

0  Asked on October 26, 2021

### What is the disadvantage using the edge ratio?

2  Asked on October 26, 2021 by claudia-rosso

### Are there stocks dynamic that cannot be represented by Generalized Black Scholes model?

1  Asked on October 26, 2021 by preston-lui

### Is there a reason why futures and options have more substitutes than other financial instruments?

1  Asked on March 11, 2021 by lithium123

### Global Maximum Drawdown and Maximum Drawdown Duration Implementation in Python

2  Asked on March 2, 2021 by dickybrown

### GARCH model using high frequency price return

1  Asked on February 25, 2021

### when deep itm european options time value increase from negative to positive

0  Asked on February 16, 2021 by wei-wu

### For option spreads, why ought the debit paid $le 75%$ of the strike width?

1  Asked on February 10, 2021

### Differentiability of solutions of a stochastic differential equation

1  Asked on February 9, 2021 by user144410

### Is there any website for a detail chronological description of U.S. index futures market development?

1  Asked on February 8, 2021 by tsz-chun-leung

### QuantLib python ql.schedule getting end of month dates

2  Asked on February 8, 2021 by user51725

### How to link market risk and the transition to the new risk-free rates?

0  Asked on February 8, 2021 by browl

### An example of Feynman-Kac

0  Asked on February 6, 2021 by moh514

### Credit VaR for this portfolio assuming no default correlation and no recovery?

0  Asked on February 5, 2021