Quantitative Finance Asked by Andy on November 28, 2020
I am trying to get my head around the CAPM model and all the intricacies of portfolio management. I have written some code to help me visualise what happens to the risk-return characteristics of my portfolio as I vary the weightings amongst three stocks (classic bullet shape).
What I don’t understand is what is special about the security market line.
$bar{r_i}-r_{f} = beta_{i}(bar{r_{M}}-r_{f})$
In short, I already know how to calculate $bar{r_i}$ (by supposing each stock as a random variable with returns following the normal distribution). Sooooo, great, the security market line gives me a new way of calculating $bar{r_i}$ with respect to how it covaries with the market portfolio, why is that special? or any more revealing than simply calculating $bar{r_i}$ as mentioned above?
I hope this makes sence.
In CAPM (security market line), the returns are endogenous. It is the result of the equilibrium of the entire market according to the mean-variance criterion, and is not determined by the so-called risk (variance, beta, or covariance). The beta value is calculated from the equilibrium return, using beta value to explain the expected return is a circular argument. In addition, calculating the beta value and then solving the expected return by CAPM is not as easy as taking the expectation of return directly.
In the framework of CAPM equilibrium, risky securities are priced as a whole, and the security returns and the market return are endogenous. Examining the return of individual security in isolation leads to the wrong causal inference that beta determines the expected return.
For the closed-form solution of CAPM formula, see CAPM: Absolute Pricing, or Relative Pricing? or Arbitrage Opportunity, Impossible Frontier, and Logical Circularity in CAPM Equilibrium
Answered by Chen Deng-Ta on November 28, 2020
CAPM is the graphical representation of the security market line. What is special about it is that it can tell you where you expect the return for an asset to be given its level of systematic risk - beta. CAPM in a way measured the price the market would expect for that level of volitility in an asset. For instance a stock is supposed to be a good investment if it has an abnormal return- that is an actual return much higher that the CAPM expected return. That way the asset is actually producing wealth above what the market says it should. CAPM is a good comparison of stock returns and their value when stocks have no dividends and hence the Gordon growth model and others are not helpful in estimating price /worth of the said asset.
Regarding portfolio weighting, to weight a portfolio requires weights and a return like you mentioned. CAPM is good as the higher the expected return of one asset, the higher the maximum portfolio return can be. It gives an estimate of what the market would say a good weighting would be for a number of stocks.
I hope this clarifies some points for you
Answered by JazKaz on November 28, 2020
1 Asked on December 11, 2020 by cune
1 Asked on December 10, 2020 by tysonu
3 Asked on December 5, 2020 by clubkli
2 Asked on December 4, 2020
convexity covariance mean variance portfolio optimization risk
3 Asked on December 3, 2020 by henrique-ramos
1 Asked on November 30, 2020 by user324313
2 Asked on November 28, 2020 by andy
0 Asked on November 28, 2020 by develarist
1 Asked on November 27, 2020 by therealcode
implied volatility monte carlo simulations volatility surface
0 Asked on November 26, 2020 by mr-sandwich
1 Asked on November 19, 2020 by john-smith
1 Asked on November 12, 2020 by mbz0
1 Asked on October 21, 2020 by kiann
1 Asked on October 14, 2020 by johncena12345678
1 Asked on October 9, 2020 by lampshadesdrifter
1 Asked on September 27, 2020 by jan-stuller
cmg theorem girsanov numeraire radon nikodym risk neutral measure
1 Asked on September 18, 2020 by dum03
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2023 AnswerBun.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP