What is the intuition behind the following entanglement distillation protocol for continuous variable systems?

Question

The protocol is:
We start with a supply
of identically prepared bipartite non-Gaussian states. The overall protocol then amounts to an iteration of the following
basic steps.

The states will be mixed pairwise locally at 50:50
beam splitters.
On one of the outputs of each beam splitter, a photon
detector distinguishes between the absence and presence of
photons. It should be noted that we do not require photon
counters that can discriminate between different photon
numbers.
In case of absence of photons at both detectors for a
particular pair, one keeps the remaining modes as an input
for the next iteration, otherwise the state is discarded.
This is one iteration of the protocol which we will continue
until we finally end up with a small number of states
that closely resemble Gaussian states.

This protocol is presented in the paper: https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.67.062320
Specifically, what I am trying to understand is: why does vacuum detection at both outputs lead to distillation? What is the motivation for this step?

Devjyoti Tripathy · Answer

To see intuitively why this protocol increases the entanglement after each iteration, we can work out an example where our initial state is say $lvert 00rangle+lvert 11rangle$. Upon passing through a 50:50 Beam Splitter, we get:
$$|00rangle+|11rangle = |00rangle+ a_{0}^{+}a_{1}^{+}|00rangle hspace{3mm}transformshspace{3mm}|00rangle + frac{1}{2}(a_{2}^{+} + ia_{3}^{+})(ia_{2}^{+} + a_{3}^{+})|00rangle \
=|00rangle + frac{i}{sqrt2}(|20rangle+|02rangle)$$
(Ignore normalisation in the above equations)
Now, upon detecting vacuum in this state and another copy of this state, we clearly see that the remaining modes now occur in a form of superposition very similar to the two mode squeezed sates which are entangled.
And since the recurrence happens by the action of the same beam splitter on similar kind of states, we can intuitively see that we get closer and closer to the superposition
$$|psi>=frac{1}{coshr}sum^{infty}_{n=0} (-1)^{n}e^{inphi}tanh^{n}r |n,n>$$

What is the intuition behind the following entanglement distillation protocol for continuous variable systems?

One Answer

Add your own answers!

Related Questions

Cirq: Result of rotating qubit measurements never come [0 1] or [1 0 ], always come as [0,0] or [1,1]

What role do Hecke operators and ideal classes perform in “Quantum Money from Modular Forms?”

The Methodology of Quantum Key Distributions Systems

Writing the Jaynes-Cumming model in QuTip

QUBO, Ising Hamiltonians and VQA

Are all pure entangled states `robust’?

Unitary Operator impact on both – the Control Qubit and the Target Register in Shor’s Algorithm

Quantum algorithms for Prolog or automated theorem proving?

Is HHL still BQP-complete when the matrix entries are only in {0,1}?

Why does $sum_n langle n|M_mrho M_m^dagger|nrangle$ simplify to $langle psi|M_m^dagger M_m|psirangle$?

Gate SWAP vs Physical SWAP in Trapped Ions for chain reordering

How to prove that EPR outcomes have equal probability no matter the basis?

Why do the constant operations in a quantum computer need second qubits?

qiskit: IQFT acting on subsystem of reversed-ordered qubits state

How to apply a operator to qubit system on the basis of current state of system?

What is the motivation for Weyl matrices in quantum information theory?

quantum circuit with feasible gates for state preparation

How to measure a general two-qubits gate? Does it help to Bob and Alice?

Easiest hash function to implement on Qiskit

How to transpile a circuit using Qiskit as done in IBMQ experience

Ask a Question