# How do Falcon 9 fairings survive the reentry?

Space Exploration Asked by Kamil Aliyev on November 25, 2021

SpaceX recently tried to recover fairings from falcon 9, which landed intact in the ocean. How come do these not burn up during reentry?

Wikipedia: "The fairing is 13 m (43 ft) long, 5.2 m (17 ft) in diameter, weighs approximately 1,900 kg, and is constructed of carbon fiber skin overlaid on an aluminum honeycomb core". Each fairing half is relatively light with a low ballistic coefficient, which means they are easily slowed down by the atmosphere without generating a huge amount of heat...

Answered by user2167137 on November 25, 2021

As a followup to Rory's excellent answer, I thought I'd just note one thing:

Ok, let me ask other way around. Why does the booster need a reentry burn to slow it down, but fairing is fine without it. Half-Fairing seems to be rather a large and fragile piece.

Fairings have a few things going for them.

First of all, they're incredibly light for their size, giving them a tiny ballistic coefficient. I don't have exact numbers, but I've heard that they're around 900 kg. Compare that with the mass of an empty F9, at 23,000 kg. At 1,600 m/s, that's ~30 GJ vs ~1 GJ of energy. Already a significant difference.

Secondly, area. The F9 fairing has a surface area of (very roughly) 106 m^2. The rear end of an F9 has an area of 10 m^2. If we assume the deceleration takes 1 minute (naive, of course), we get 181 kw per m^2 for the fairing and 4.9 MW per m^2 on the rear end of a F9. Broad daylight delivers about a kilowatt per m^2, for reference. This means the material will have an easier time dissipating the heat non-destructively.

To put this in perspective a bit more, the heat dissipated in the F9 would heat the 9 Merlin engines (assuming they're made of aluminum, naively of course again) to 8600 degrees. A full aluminum fairing would heat to just 1400 degrees.

This all neglects the insanely complex dynamics of hypersonic compressive heating. Some proportion of the heat is typically dissipated in the air itself, turning it into plasma - I don't currently have time to research what this coefficient would be. It also neglects the ablative nature of all the materials involved.

Answered by 0xDBFB7 on November 25, 2021

Burning up happens through heat generated through friction* between an object and the atmosphere.

When the fairing was deployed, the rocket was only travelling at 6500km/h. (As an example, the Chelyabinsk meteor was estimated at ten times that speed)

The fairing had been on the rocket on the way up, accelerating to that speed, and on its way down at only slowed through drag with the atmosphere, and with a parafoil towards the end.

There was nothing that would generate enough heat for it to burn up at that speed.

*In technical terms this comes actually from the shockwave in front of an object entering the atmosphere. It compresses the air in front of it, and this compression can dramatically heat the air, which then heats the object.

Looks pretty good after coming back as well, a little toasted.

On board ship:

Answered by Rory Alsop on November 25, 2021

## Related Questions

### Why are RTGs different colors?

3  Asked on January 6, 2022

### Ramscoop for a space station or lunar base?

2  Asked on January 6, 2022

### If Curiosity had lights, could it drive or work in the evening?

3  Asked on January 2, 2022

### Number of segment in Wing leading Edges

2  Asked on December 30, 2021 by mystical-kaleidoscope

### Why are all space initiatives designed to get to space overnight when in Nature all extreme feats are achieved in a gradual process

7  Asked on December 28, 2021 by kevin-bueno

### After 21 years of silence how and by whom was OSCAR-7 first identified as functional?

1  Asked on December 28, 2021

### What is this “black box” at the top of Apollo 17 CM?

2  Asked on December 28, 2021

### Where does MSL end and Curiosity begin?

1  Asked on December 26, 2021

### Are we still able to terraform Mars using greenhouse effect?

1  Asked on December 26, 2021 by user17622

### How sharp are the bits of sand and rock on mars?

0  Asked on December 26, 2021

### What would the full hypothetical Mars terraforming roadmap look like?

3  Asked on December 24, 2021 by elgirhath

### How does the Mars 2020 rover’s suspension and center of gravity compare to Curiosity’s?

1  Asked on December 24, 2021

### At what inclined grade would Curiosity or Perseverance require twice the electrical power to drive compared to driving on flat terrain?

0  Asked on December 24, 2021

### Did the Mars Science Laboratory do any science that wasn’t done by Curiosity proper?

1  Asked on December 24, 2021

### Now that Perseverance is “hot” (RTG in place) and before it gets to deep space, how will it stay cool?

1  Asked on December 22, 2021

### What is the equivalent of Curiosity’s “MSL” in the context of Perseverance? What’s the official name of the mission? Are the distinctions similar?

1  Asked on December 22, 2021

### Can the top soil of Mars be transformed to be arable, and how to do it?

3  Asked on December 21, 2021

### Can anyone find a more recent NASA paid for study on lunar tunnel-boring machine?

1  Asked on December 19, 2021 by duane-lawrence

### What were these bent clamps at the top of Apollo 11 CM used for?

1  Asked on December 19, 2021

### What is the oldest artificial satellite still in use?

4  Asked on December 16, 2021